Really very much sorry for the double post but if I just modify my previous post it will be easily overglanced so temporarily I'll say it here (/me hopes there are no ill-mooded moderators around)

Add vectors as a data structure! Like so:

Vector2
Vector3
Vector4

just like in C#/XNA. Sir will most likely know what I am talking about, its very usefull.

DJ, i would love to see an integrated game-designing language for a calculator, but i feel like SAT/ACT testing people would look at that feature and immediately be turned away. that's why i'd rather have this a math-oriented language. of course getkey and output will be supported.

i'm currently editing in all the suggestions (i didn't have easy things such as multiplication, addition, subtraction etc. in because i was on a phone). right now i'm not going to put what each operator/function will look like, just the name. i remember someone suggested using = as the assignment operator and == as the equality. i'm just going to write down assignment and operator, as the actual symbol will depend upon the hardware. thank you all for the suggestions, keep them coming!

I'm guessing "OTAxe" (given the naming trend of things around here...) would probably just be as the current Axe is- a downloaded compiler for the calculator. However, I agree that "OT Basic" would have to be math-oriented and there definitely would have to be a Press-To-Test mode.

*better, have it do Delvar agxz

Ooops, was thinking like in ti-basic where the variables are A-Z and theta.

Maybe a function to convert 3d coordinates to a 2d projection, and another one to fill polygons.

I know that we don't want the language to seem game-oriented, but I think that there should be a way to draw sprites on the screen (though it obviously wouldn't be called that). Maybe a recallpic sort of thing with images of a custom size?

3D may be a tad unrealistic, how about a built-in raycaster?

i always liked the variable management of the 86. It was very C-like. You could have a variable up to 8 letters long, and you wouldn't need to call it, for example "prgmVAR", you could just use it as VAR instead. That way, if you needed to switch the variable type you were using, it would be less work.

EDIT: @DJ

What about having a programming language, (game oriented) and a function creator? The function creator would be very similar to the nspire's language, simple to use and very similar to the home screen. The game creator would be much more complicated, function-wise.