0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: JosJuice on December 10, 2010, 10:19:48 amQuote from: ScoutDavid on December 10, 2010, 10:12:16 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 03:42:14 pmQuote from: ScoutDavid on December 08, 2010, 11:56:23 amQuote from: JosJuice on December 08, 2010, 09:22:08 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now... OVER 9000? That's impossible!!! :Yes, .jpg addes images 999999*10^9 grayscale levelsWhat's that? Your post was a quote?It looks like he accidentally his text inside your quote.This, that tends to happen with quick reply because the text area is small. X.x
Quote from: ScoutDavid on December 10, 2010, 10:12:16 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 03:42:14 pmQuote from: ScoutDavid on December 08, 2010, 11:56:23 amQuote from: JosJuice on December 08, 2010, 09:22:08 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now... OVER 9000? That's impossible!!! :Yes, .jpg addes images 999999*10^9 grayscale levelsWhat's that? Your post was a quote?It looks like he accidentally his text inside your quote.
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 03:42:14 pmQuote from: ScoutDavid on December 08, 2010, 11:56:23 amQuote from: JosJuice on December 08, 2010, 09:22:08 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now... OVER 9000? That's impossible!!! :Yes, .jpg addes images 999999*10^9 grayscale levelsWhat's that? Your post was a quote?
Quote from: ScoutDavid on December 08, 2010, 11:56:23 amQuote from: JosJuice on December 08, 2010, 09:22:08 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now... OVER 9000? That's impossible!!! :Yes, .jpg addes images 999999*10^9 grayscale levels
Quote from: JosJuice on December 08, 2010, 09:22:08 amQuote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now... OVER 9000? That's impossible!!! :Yes, .jpg addes images 999999*10^9 grayscale levels
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on December 08, 2010, 04:03:37 amI still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.Yeah, that picture is almost like 52353462 levels of gray now...
I still use them from time to time when I post a large image that ends up too large in PNG format but looks terrible in GIF format. For pixel art it's not recommended, though, because of the lossy compression.
