Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
About
Team
Rules
Stats
Status
Sitemap
Chat
Downloads
Forum
News
Our Projects
Major Community Projects
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Replies
Tools
SourceCoder3
Other Things...
Omnimaga Radio
TI-83 Plus ASM File Unsquisher
Z80 Conversion Tools
IES TI File Editor
Free RAM areas
Comprehensive Getkeyr table
URL Shortener
Online Axe Tilemap Editor
Help
Contact Us
Change Request
Report Issue/Bug
Team
Articles
Members
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Buddies
Login
Register
Omnimaga
»
Forum
»
Calculator Community
»
TI Calculators
»
ASM
»
Developing ASM Programs
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Author
Topic: Developing ASM Programs (Read 6571 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Demon
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
on:
January 30, 2007, 12:36:00 pm »
Would you rather develop programs for ION or MirageOS?
I asked because I was looking in the help browser on Latenite and ION has like only nine routines you can use in your ASM programs so you don't have to spend days writing (and debugging) code to do stuff like sprites and random numbers, etc.
Then I looked at the functions MirageOS had and turns out MirageOS has a crapload of routines - like ~74 routines ranging from strings to pixels to sprites to programs to mathematics and compression and more, and I was like, "Jeez, with all these functions availible in MirageOS, why would anyone want to write for ION anymore?"
Logged
Halifax
LV9
Veteran (Next: 1337)
Posts: 1334
Rating: +2/-1
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #1 on:
January 30, 2007, 12:41:00 pm »
Ion is simple an advanced programmers like it better and also you have a larger target because ION and MOS users can use it but if you only develop for MOS only MOS people can use it not Ion people personally a lot of the routnies that MOS has are crap and I program Ion so... I go with Ion
Logged
There are 10 types of people in this world-- those that can read binary, and those that can't.
trevmeister66
LV9
Veteran (Next: 1337)
Posts: 1009
Rating: +14/-5
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #2 on:
January 30, 2007, 01:07:00 pm »
hmm, well since i just started learning asm, and that last statement has nothing to do with my choice, so i'll go with ion since it can be in both ion and mos. Maybe you could make one specificaly for each one?
Logged
Projects: nameless RPG: 1.0% |
Reverse Snake v1.5:
100% | Secret Project: 5% | DUNGEON: 70%
My
MW2 Blog
<-- Please visit
Delnar_Ersike
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #3 on:
January 30, 2007, 01:48:00 pm »
I go with Mirage OS because:
1) It's an app
2) Some programs are named "A"
3) Mirage OS can run Ion programs, but not vice versa
4) It can execute programs that are in the archive by copying them into a temp. program. For Ion, you have to archive/unarchive the programs you want to use
5) I have noticed that having Ion on your calc drains 2k RAM, which limits some programs. Mirage OS does not drain your RAM
6) It has a more user-friendly interface
7) It OS can run BASIC programs
I think that's a long enough list
Logged
trevmeister66
LV9
Veteran (Next: 1337)
Posts: 1009
Rating: +14/-5
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #4 on:
January 30, 2007, 02:01:00 pm »
wow, you just convinced me to go with MOS (actually i use that one on my calc anyways
Logged
Projects: nameless RPG: 1.0% |
Reverse Snake v1.5:
100% | Secret Project: 5% | DUNGEON: 70%
My
MW2 Blog
<-- Please visit
Liazon
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #5 on:
January 30, 2007, 02:33:00 pm »
there's a difference between using the shell and programming for it.
Use MOS to play all your games and all that, but program for the ion shell because then it's compatible with virtually every shell.
Also, most of the MOS routines were for implementing the MOS browser GUI. they were just nice enough to put in a jump table for anyone to use any of the routines.
However, DoorCS is probably better if you want GUI related routines since it has some mouse routines. I still probably wouldn't recommend it.
The goal is to get to a point where if you really wanted to, you can figure out how to do anything you want. If you don't have time, well be glad you've learned enough ASM that if you had time, you could probably write anything.
Logged
bfr
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 819
Rating: +4/-0
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #6 on:
January 30, 2007, 02:33:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-Delnar_Ersike+30 Jan, 2007, 18:48-->
QUOTE
(Delnar_Ersike @ 30 Jan, 2007, 18:48)
3) Mirage OS can run Ion programs, but not vice versa
That's not a reason to develop for MirageOS instead of Ion.
Note that Demon is asking which one should he
develop
for, not which one should he use on his calculator.
I don't know anybody that uses Ion anymore. But, just to be safe, if your program doesn't need any of MirageOS's routines, I recommend building it for Ion. If it really needs one of MirageOS's routines, then build it to use MirageOS.
EDIT: Liazon, you posted right before me. Just thought I'd mention that.... :lol:
Logged
bfr's website -
http://bfr.tifreakware.net
Delnar_Ersike
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #7 on:
January 30, 2007, 04:43:00 pm »
Well, if you are choosing a shell to
developing
for, I suggest writing the program for Ion, but making sure you make a Mirage OS version as well (you just need to add some minor stuff like the program icon). And if you are really up to it, make a version for CrunchyOS as well
.
Logged
DJ Omnimaga
Clacualters are teh gr33t
CoT Emeritus
LV15
Omnimagician (Next: --)
Posts: 55943
Rating: +3154/-232
CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #8 on:
January 31, 2007, 03:40:00 am »
i got for ion, because then your program is compatible with both, not just MOS
Logged
CureDesu
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #9 on:
January 31, 2007, 10:22:00 am »
I'd have to agree. Unless you direly need the MOS functions, go for Ion.
Logged
threefingeredguy
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #10 on:
January 31, 2007, 10:44:00 pm »
Always Ion.
Logged
DJ Omnimaga
Clacualters are teh gr33t
CoT Emeritus
LV15
Omnimagician (Next: --)
Posts: 55943
Rating: +3154/-232
CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #11 on:
February 01, 2007, 04:03:00 pm »
uhm why was this in off topic discussion? *moves to calc help and support*
Logged
elfprince13
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #12 on:
February 01, 2007, 04:18:00 pm »
the other thing is ION makes it insanely easy to port to nostub.
Logged
DJ Omnimaga
Clacualters are teh gr33t
CoT Emeritus
LV15
Omnimagician (Next: --)
Posts: 55943
Rating: +3154/-232
CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #13 on:
February 01, 2007, 04:32:00 pm »
true, some ion prgms even work nostub, like galaxian
Logged
Fallen Ghost
Guest
Developing ASM Programs
«
Reply #14 on:
February 01, 2007, 04:35:00 pm »
I prefer using neither. Nostub allows you to be run from asm( and from some shells, such as DCS and if you just put an ION header, will be read by every single shell.
It also allows you to be more in control of what the program does and sometimes add functionalities to such routines.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
« previous
next »
Omnimaga
»
Forum
»
Calculator Community
»
TI Calculators
»
ASM
»
Developing ASM Programs