0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I think he meant an 8-bit comparison, not a 16 bit comparison...
Quote from: ZippyDee on May 03, 2012, 11:50:44 pmI think he meant an 8-bit comparison, not a 16 bit comparison...He said he wanted it "to return false when A=256 for A=0," which would be sixteen bits (which it already is).Since you're setting it as a pointer, here's something to keep in mind, if you're not aware of it already: Numbers are stored in little-endian format, which means the first byte is the low byte (the the number modulo 256), and the byte after it is the high byte (the number divided by 256).So if you're doing something like 1→{°A+1} when A was originally zero, A would now equal 256.Not sure if that's your problem, but I hope that helps.
I don't get why we can't just have the bytes go in a logical order.
I actually don't even get what "to return false when A=256 for A=0" means O.o explain please?