I predict Runer will win this hands down...

Note: Pure Axe means without the use of Assembly

Okay, this compiles and doesn't crash:

{°A}+(X^3°port+9[30]#Realloc(°W){°r1*6,2[23]}+°Θport→{{A}^r}

I would think so, yes.

It does, that way you can tell us if we get your code's function wrong.
Zippy beat me to it.

Okay, this compiles and doesn't crash:

{°A}+(X^3°port+9[30]#Realloc(°W){°r1*6,2[23]}+°Θport→{{A}^r}

Stores the bottom 8 bits of A in HL, pushes HL, takes the value of X mod 3 and puts in HL, attempts to find the address of symbol port but resolves to nothing, adds 9, adds $30 to the .data section of the program, reallocated the standard variables so that A corresponds to W, B corresponds to X, etc., pushes HL, gets the address of the var r1*6, puts 2 in HL, adds $23 to the .data section of the program, pops HL, adds the address of the var theta, takes the state of the link port and stores to the byte pointed to by the short pointed to by the value of A.  Whew

My turn my turn! 

({{rand+nib{8/cos(SQRT(rand20)⁺8erandrand)16BITANDsin(->F)}}->{°Θ}^r/{_EFFFF xor L1))}16BITXOR{->{°C-4}^rr°A+{^Trand*85+rand^°C}}^r}//{rand+L1}²)**{F} and {5max(,)5}

Edit: I'll admit when I wrote this I had no idea what °port would correspond to.  My theory is that it basically would result to returning nothing, ignore the port and simply preserve HL, or even possibly returning the address of the embedded "port" function added to the .text portion of the program.  With a quick test, I realized this wont even compile just because of those two tokens .  So, without that, it's working code -- and I stick by everything else I described in function.

It'll basically apply the dereferencing of the { } to the equation on the left hand of the comma into HL, and the expression on the right is subsequently executed like normal.  Therefore, {5,6} basically means {5}:6.  Though, it doesn't seem to always compile .  However, when you can get it to do so, that's what it'll represent.

Edit: it'll always compile though if you leave out the ending }, I found.  {5,6: compiles consitantly and works like I described.