0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Keoni29 on November 03, 2011, 02:38:29 pmQuote from: MGOS on November 03, 2011, 02:37:57 pmQuote from: Keoni29 on November 03, 2011, 01:37:09 pmQuote from: yeongJIN_COOL on November 03, 2011, 11:59:07 ambetter syntax: LABEL(parameter,parameter etc is that new?I think it came with 1.0.1 or so with these many updates.Is it faster?No, it's just another syntax form to do exact the same thing. But it saves one or two bytes in your source.
Quote from: MGOS on November 03, 2011, 02:37:57 pmQuote from: Keoni29 on November 03, 2011, 01:37:09 pmQuote from: yeongJIN_COOL on November 03, 2011, 11:59:07 ambetter syntax: LABEL(parameter,parameter etc is that new?I think it came with 1.0.1 or so with these many updates.Is it faster?
Quote from: Keoni29 on November 03, 2011, 01:37:09 pmQuote from: yeongJIN_COOL on November 03, 2011, 11:59:07 ambetter syntax: LABEL(parameter,parameter etc is that new?I think it came with 1.0.1 or so with these many updates.
Quote from: yeongJIN_COOL on November 03, 2011, 11:59:07 ambetter syntax: LABEL(parameter,parameter etc is that new?
better syntax: LABEL(parameter,parameter etc
Quote from: MGOS on November 03, 2011, 02:40:45 pm.... But it saves one or two bytes in your source.I use a lot of the old syntax. Maybe 20 times, so it would save 40 bytes. Not much, but I'd rather optimize as much as I can.
.... But it saves one or two bytes in your source.
haha yeah, but it usually means less code readability. Depends on what you care about, I guess.
if (d=94)x->d0->gendif (g=1)d-1->dendif getkey(54)1->gPt_On(d,y)dispgraphEndif pxltest d+1,ypt-off #the pixels around it you want to destroyend