0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: SirCmpwn on June 14, 2010, 10:00:06 amQuote from: meishe91 on June 13, 2010, 11:23:22 pmSorry, I haven't had a chance to really look at it yet. Been very tired and busy. I will soon though. Something though occurred to me. Will you be updating this as things change throughout the newer versions and such?The one posted in this forum is not even a version. It's just to get a review for style.I think he's asking if you'll keep updating the final version as Axe evolves.
Quote from: meishe91 on June 13, 2010, 11:23:22 pmSorry, I haven't had a chance to really look at it yet. Been very tired and busy. I will soon though. Something though occurred to me. Will you be updating this as things change throughout the newer versions and such?The one posted in this forum is not even a version. It's just to get a review for style.
Sorry, I haven't had a chance to really look at it yet. Been very tired and busy. I will soon though. Something though occurred to me. Will you be updating this as things change throughout the newer versions and such?
Are you going to use the OP registers Sir, or are you going to actually implement it in Axe?
det(1)[89 19 80 61 22 02 65 10]->Str1conj(Str1-1, E8478, 9)
that seems a bit hard to read. It would be good to have something easier to read and store when coding
Crap, this topic was bumped, now I actually have to work on this.