« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM  (Read 4826 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flyingfisch

  • I'm 1337 now!
  • Members
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1620
  • Rating: +94/-17
  • Testing, testing, 1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8..9
    • View Profile
    • Top Page Website Design
9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« on: January 06, 2012, 03:57:28 pm »
I dont have a prizm, but if someone would like to post the seconds it takes for prizm to finish the 9-queens problem (code below) we could compare its speed to other calcs

Code: [Select]
10->J
Lbl 2
1.0000001->A
A->B
27->I
Lbl 1
A*A->A
B^2.01->B
Dsz I:Goto 1
Dsz J:Goto 2
"A=":A,
"B=":B,
« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 04:08:37 pm by flyingfisch »
Logged



Quote from: my dad
"welcome to the world of computers, where everything seems to be based on random number generators"



The Game V. 2.0

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm »
2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models  <_<
« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 04:15:56 pm by Qwerty.55 »
Logged
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline Nick

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1166
  • Rating: +161/-3
  • You just got omnom'd
    • View Profile
    • Nick Steen
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2012, 04:22:00 pm »
could it be that this takes only 1.0 seconds on the TI-Nspire ??? (variates from 0.7-1.2)
Logged

Offline flyingfisch

  • I'm 1337 now!
  • Members
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1620
  • Rating: +94/-17
  • Testing, testing, 1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8..9
    • View Profile
    • Top Page Website Design
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2012, 05:12:17 pm »
Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm
2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models  <_<

Isnt it possible to overclock the PRIZM?
Logged



Quote from: my dad
"welcome to the world of computers, where everything seems to be based on random number generators"



The Game V. 2.0

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2012, 07:01:19 pm »
Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm
2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models  <_<

O.O

Wow... there definitively needs a third-party OS for the Prizm... maybe Kerm can convince AHelper to start prizm programming and make GlassOS for the Prizm too? :P
Logged

Offline flyingfisch

  • I'm 1337 now!
  • Members
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1620
  • Rating: +94/-17
  • Testing, testing, 1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8..9
    • View Profile
    • Top Page Website Design
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2012, 07:32:09 pm »
Quote from: DJ_O on January 06, 2012, 07:01:19 pm
Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm
2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models  <_<

O.O

Wow... there definitively needs a third-party OS for the Prizm... maybe Kerm can convince AHelper to start prizm programming and make GlassOS for the Prizm too? :P

Enter Project FixOS
Logged



Quote from: my dad
"welcome to the world of computers, where everything seems to be based on random number generators"



The Game V. 2.0

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2012, 09:13:43 pm »
Yeah I saw that one. Hopefully this comes to fruition eventually.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »