0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
By emulator you mean the Nspire Student Software right?I don't know how it would be possible to install it on a flash drive, but I don't see much of a purpose - Goplat's emulator is perfectly fine for me.
For question 5, I think TI should have the same reaction, as in wishing to allow third-party development in C while keepimg calculators safe for testing purposes, but instead they are like, BLOCK EVERYTHING.
<...>I have to say, I really was surprised by how well the Prizm handlescompared to TI calculators. There are a lot of functions and toolsthat are more readily available on the Prizm than on a TI calculator.Something I'd like to suggest however, is perhaps the inclusion ofsome of your programming capabilities. There is a surprisingly bigcommunity behind developing for these calculators, as you've probablyseen with sites like Cemetech. Furthermore, it would also serve to getstudents taking your course to learn programming topics and ideas,which can be very helpful in mathematics and beyond. Nowadays, therearen't many opportunities for students to get introduced toprogramming, and that could be cause for some concern. TI calculatorsused to counteract that. Many students were introduced to programmingthrough TI Basic. However, with recent developments regarding theNspire and Ndless, TI has shown that they have more or less forsakenthat role. From what I know about Casio, you guys don't want tosuppress that. All I can really say is, capitalize on that.Advertising that your product has excellent programming capabilitiesis definitely a plus. (You could also think of it this way. If wecan get Doom, video players, and Gameboy color emulators on a platformthat TI does its hardest to lock down, just think about what could bedeveloped for a platform that embraces advanced, low levelprogramming) (^If that sounds incomprehensible, forgive me, I'm way too tired. lol) Thank you.
<...> You are not the first to mention programming and we areinvestigating the possibility but I am in no position to comment on thelikelihood of that happening.
Thank you for your response to my comments. It's nice to hear thatCasio is actively looking into the possibility. I hope for the best.
Hello again,My investigation was very quickly cut short. I have been instructed to respond (and I quote): "Casio does not have a plan to release SDK for PRIZM"That doesn't mean that I and a few others won't keep suggesting it or trying alternate ideas; but R&D is concerned with inappropriate use.We will continue to hope for the best.
Ok, I under stand the means to keep the calculator appropriate forschools. Personally, in my own opinion there wouldn't need to be aproper SDK released for future calculators. I think many people wouldlike to see perhaps just the ability to run more powerful languages oncalc, or to see a beefed up version of CasioBasic. Although that mightbe the same as an SDK now that I think about it. :S However, somethingthat could be suggested, is improving the performance of CasioBasic aswell as, perhaps, making it closer to OO languages seen all aroundtoday. I know that, since I stated programming with TI Basic, while itwhetted my appetite for programming, it severely hurt my ability totransition into computer languages like C/C++... Luckily I managed tocatch on and now I'm working towards a Bachelors Degree in ComputerScience. However, others might not be able to catch on like I did andbecause Basic is so different from modern languages, it can hurt theirunderstanding. So moving towards a more OO paradigm can help a lot.Also, I wonder if CasioBasic could ever be modified to be compiledrather than interpreted. Steps would have to be taken to ensure itcan't hurt the calc, but from what I've seen with Axe and Grammar(although Grammar is interpreted) it's a very popular choice, and itcan speed up the language dramatically.I also know that a lot of people chafe sometimes at the memorycapacity of calculators. There have been some quite large applicationsdeveloped for previous products that have forced some users to removeother applications due to space requirements. I know that RAM isrelatively cheap nowadays (I can get a 1 Terabyte 3.0 USB PortableHard Drive for about $130 off of newegg) So I know that increasedmemory storage could possibly be a viable option that would go well inyour favor. Although that's just my idea... I've always wondered what it would belike if there were to be a device meant specifically for developersthat would allow them to program and work on code on the go. Now quitea miniature computer, but not just a cheap toy. But I digress. Hopefully, at the very least, future products don't completely forsakethe programming capabilities. TI did that with the Nspire series andit hurt them quite badly. Thanks for looking into it, I appreciate it.
Very good suggestions, <>. I think the best hope is that we'll somehow improve the programming feature set. I have some programming background and am familiar with C++, Java and Python and I agree that the existing Basic functionality is tough to return to.When we are working on the next iteration of our technology we'll see what we can do!Thanks!
2. Catalog Help: An absolutely fabulous idea -- I don't make these decisions, but I'm going to push for this one.
Also I sent him a question of my own a few days back, about the ability to install the emulator on a flash drive:Quote from: SelfHi, a question about the emulator, the license of which is offered in this promotion. Can it be installed on a flash drive or similar, so you can bring it with you?If not, is this planned for the future?Quote from: Nathan (Casio)Hi <snip>, That's a fascinating question. Let me respond with a question of my own, since I don't often install software on flash drives: wouldn't something like that require zero copy protection? The ability to do something like that would clearly be useful, but if it short-circuited our ability to market our product then it would amount to shooting ourselves in the foot. Standard copy protection as I understand it would either require a registry entry (which would require installation on a machine, not a flash drive) OR would require a disc in the drive (which would make a flash drive installation pointless, I believe). Am I missing other options? I hope these questions make sense and I really am interested in your response. Kind Regards,NathanAside from how amazing it is to get a response from an actual person rather than an auto-responder hooked up to Cleverbot or something (insert :TI: smiley again )..any ideas? The only sort of thing I can come up with is some sort of ID that you register somewhere, kind of like the calc's serial number. Perhaps part of the validation process would involve checking some db for the same ID? But then that might require internet access...I'm not too familiar with this sort of stuff
Hi, a question about the emulator, the license of which is offered in this promotion. Can it be installed on a flash drive or similar, so you can bring it with you?If not, is this planned for the future?
Hi <snip>, That's a fascinating question. Let me respond with a question of my own, since I don't often install software on flash drives: wouldn't something like that require zero copy protection? The ability to do something like that would clearly be useful, but if it short-circuited our ability to market our product then it would amount to shooting ourselves in the foot. Standard copy protection as I understand it would either require a registry entry (which would require installation on a machine, not a flash drive) OR would require a disc in the drive (which would make a flash drive installation pointless, I believe). Am I missing other options? I hope these questions make sense and I really am interested in your response. Kind Regards,Nathan
Quote2. Catalog Help: An absolutely fabulous idea -- I don't make these decisions, but I'm going to push for this one.These CASIO guys are funny. They had a Catalog Help implemented on the fx-9860 slim and dropped the idea with the following systems.
These CASIO guys are funny. They had a Catalog Help implemented on the fx-9860 slim and dropped the idea with the following systems.