0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?
Quote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?
Quote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.
There is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*
Quote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.
Quote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.
Quote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:05:53 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.When we blame the OS, we really mean the Basic language. It's definitely possible to do faster stuff without a whole new OS, as we saw on the TI-83+.
Quote from: calc84maniac on March 21, 2011, 12:52:52 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:05:53 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.When we blame the OS, we really mean the Basic language. It's definitely possible to do faster stuff without a whole new OS, as we saw on the TI-83+.The slowdown is part of the OS since the BASIC language is part of the OS, but just like you said, it's possible to fix it without a new OS - but it's still the OS's fault that drawing is slow.also: I like quote pyramids.
Quote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:55:41 pmQuote from: calc84maniac on March 21, 2011, 12:52:52 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:05:53 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.When we blame the OS, we really mean the Basic language. It's definitely possible to do faster stuff without a whole new OS, as we saw on the TI-83+.The slowdown is part of the OS since the BASIC language is part of the OS, but just like you said, it's possible to fix it without a new OS - but it's still the OS's fault that drawing is slow.also: I like quote pyramids.Yeah, they are kinda fun aren't they. So, we need either AXE or KOS for prizm calcs now.
Since I do not know much about Casio calculators, I have a little question: can you run assembly on the prism?
Quote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 01:15:22 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:55:41 pmQuote from: calc84maniac on March 21, 2011, 12:52:52 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:05:53 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.When we blame the OS, we really mean the Basic language. It's definitely possible to do faster stuff without a whole new OS, as we saw on the TI-83+.The slowdown is part of the OS since the BASIC language is part of the OS, but just like you said, it's possible to fix it without a new OS - but it's still the OS's fault that drawing is slow.also: I like quote pyramids.Yeah, they are kinda fun aren't they. So, we need either AXE or KOS for prizm calcs now.And maybe PrizmSuite too?
Quote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 01:19:22 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 01:15:22 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:55:41 pmQuote from: calc84maniac on March 21, 2011, 12:52:52 pmQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 12:05:53 pmQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 11:58:52 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:38:34 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:36:04 amQuote from: JosJuice on March 21, 2011, 09:31:16 amQuote from: graphmastur on March 21, 2011, 09:24:37 amThere is no way that took 15 minutes to render. There's just... What the heck. Okay, so is this the OS or hardwares' fault? That's actually on the calc, right? Could you show a video of that. Maybe put a camera over it, and host a livestream or something? *shrugs*It's the OS, no doubt about it. Drawing something like this in asm is probably about as fast as on an 8x calc.Wow. So, CKOS or what?EDIT: IE: Casio-Knight OS or what?What do you mean?lol, KOS for Casio calcs. As in a new OS instead of the one that comes with the calc.It would probably take a very long time until it becomes possible to make a third-party OS.When we blame the OS, we really mean the Basic language. It's definitely possible to do faster stuff without a whole new OS, as we saw on the TI-83+.The slowdown is part of the OS since the BASIC language is part of the OS, but just like you said, it's possible to fix it without a new OS - but it's still the OS's fault that drawing is slow.also: I like quote pyramids.Yeah, they are kinda fun aren't they. So, we need either AXE or KOS for prizm calcs now.And maybe PrizmSuite too? Err.. Working on a temporary assembler for Qwerty.55 before I can work on that. And that reminds me. Can anyone please explain how instructions that branch work. I'm interested in calculating the displacements. Qwerty.55 gave me some test code, but I still can't figure out how many bytes back stuff should be. For example, what looks like it should be -6 bytes back is -4, or -5, or stuff like that.
ClrGraphAxesOff0→CFor 4→E To 6For 1→A To 2^EFor 1→B To 2^EBlue PxlOn A,B+CNextNext2^E+10+C→CNext
I have no idea what the status is on this -- but that fact that we can't really use and compile a C program for it yet shows more work must be done.
Author
Topic: Low level hardware emulation (Read 13857 times)
