Author Topic: LCD vs CRT (Read 11881 times)

Demon · « **on:** November 22, 2006, 01:04:00 pm »

My choice would be an LCD monitor 'cause they're much easier on the eyes.

JincS · « **Reply #1 on:** November 22, 2006, 01:09:00 pm »

LCD for size, CRT for quality. Just my opinion.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #2 on:** November 22, 2006, 02:08:00 pm »

LCD for space it takes compared to CRT, the fact max size for CRT seems to be 19inch

spengo · « **Reply #3 on:** November 22, 2006, 07:12:00 pm »

It used to be CRT for quality, but now it's definitely LCD for both. LCD pwnz0rz.

@xlibman I have in fact seen a 21" CRT... it was monstrous

Spellshaper · « **Reply #4 on:** November 23, 2006, 02:50:00 am »

I myself still have a CRT, and it's ok... save for the random screen failures I am getting.

CRTs do provide a better screen quality, but are bulky and heavy.
LCDs on the other hand are easier for the eyes and not as heavy and big, but only work good when set to max. resolution, else the OSD has to do interpolation. Which is crap.

So over all, I still like LCDs better. Must get one. Screen slowly failing. help my comp! ^^'

stoner_wall_programs · « **Reply #5 on:** November 24, 2006, 05:51:00 am »

I prefer LCDs, only because that's the kind of monitor that I have, and am very attached to my monitor.

~Egan

Netham45 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 01, 2006, 07:31:00 am »

I like LCDs, because all of the CRT's in my house flicker when I turn my dishwasher on, but I like CRT's because they have a higher max resolution, and change that easier.

I guess this is why my pc has 1 LCD monitor and 1 CRT monitor.

spengo · « **Reply #7 on:** December 01, 2006, 08:38:00 am »

uhh.. my lcd is 1680*1050, don't think I'd need higher than that unless I had a 20" screen or something.

Rofl @ dishwasher though.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #8 on:** December 01, 2006, 04:01:00 pm »

that must be crazy a game running at 60 fps on 1280x1024 or higher with high details textures

spengo · « **Reply #9 on:** December 01, 2006, 06:44:00 pm »

mm... well cs:s and bf2 and all the shader model 2 games I run at about 1280*1024 or whatever the crap the closest widescreen setting is to that. All the settings maxed except like anti-aliasing and anisropic filtering and that super fancy jazz. Oblivion on the other hand...

graywolf · « **Reply #10 on:** December 02, 2006, 06:42:00 am »

Yah, Oblivion takes up all you computer's resources. But if you have your resolution maxed out, it should look pretty good.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #11 on:** December 02, 2006, 07:13:00 am »

I dont have a very powerful vid card, its better than intel extreme graphics 2 cards tho but for example Halo 1 will run at 20 ish fps with everything maxed out, but if ppl come online or if i play campaing mode it start running slower

graywolf · « **Reply #12 on:** December 02, 2006, 07:20:00 am »

So you probably have some nvidia FX or ati radeon

but yah thats kinda slow. maybe you should upgrade...

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #13 on:** December 02, 2006, 07:28:00 am »

ATI Radeon 9250

128 MB actually

but its the max my PCI motherboard support

, when i move to my appartment I'll have more space so I'll get a more powerful PC but just for gaming

graywolf · « **Reply #14 on:** December 02, 2006, 10:29:00 am »

I'm gonna work this summer and get a MacBookPro

Author Topic: LCD vs CRT (Read 11881 times)

Demon

spengo

stoner_wall_programs

spengo

spengo

graywolf

graywolf

graywolf