Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
About
Team
Rules
Stats
Status
Sitemap
Chat
Downloads
Forum
News
Our Projects
Major Community Projects
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Replies
Tools
SourceCoder3
Other Things...
Omnimaga Radio
TI-83 Plus ASM File Unsquisher
Z80 Conversion Tools
IES TI File Editor
Free RAM areas
Comprehensive Getkeyr table
URL Shortener
Online Axe Tilemap Editor
Help
Contact Us
Change Request
Report Issue/Bug
Team
Articles
Members
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Buddies
Login
Register
Omnimaga
»
Forum
»
Calculator Community
»
TI Calculators
»
General Calculator Help
»
Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
...
6
Go Down
Author
Topic: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test (Read 27319 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #15 on:
March 15, 2012, 02:34:23 pm »
Free RAM areas? Well there are 2 display buffers. Normal and popup. Sadly, I don't exactly know how to properly draw graphics on the popup.
If I used variables to store the location and type of pixels, how exactly would I do it?
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #16 on:
March 15, 2012, 02:55:57 pm »
I know you have been posting in the Grammer threads, too, so I will explain how to do it in Grammer (and probably Axe/Asm) and see if you can do it on the NXT:
First, can you draw or pixel test on other buffers? If so, for what I have been doing today. For each enemy, I have two sprites. One to be displayed and the other contains the hit as pixels on. For example, I draw this sprite to the viewing buffer:
Then on the other buffer, I draw this hitbox at the same location:
There is no need to make it like this, either. You can have a huge hitbox for enemies with some kind of aura or things like that. Anyways, then all I need to do is whenever I move, I just pixel test the location I am moving to. If there is a pixel on, it means it is in the hitbox. so you just don't move there.
The nice thing is, you can have several buffers for other things. For example, one buffer for collision, one buffer for killzones, et cetera.
Again, this all relies on the ability to pixel-test other buffers. I don't know if this helped clarify things or not
«
Last Edit: March 15, 2012, 02:56:38 pm by Xeda112358
»
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #17 on:
March 15, 2012, 02:59:44 pm »
Wait... You can create buffers??
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #18 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:00:32 pm »
I am not sure about the NXT, but in Grammer, yes (and in Axe/Asm)
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #19 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:06:40 pm »
When you say buffer, do you actually mean that it really is a real buffer?
EDIT: The way I do it is I just turn off screen refreshing, draw the solid pixels, test the pixels, then draw the
kill pixels, test the pixels, then draw what you actually see. Then I turn on screen refreshing, so you only see the last picture. But the problem is, is that the more different types of pixels, the slower it will go and the worse the grayscale will be.
«
Last Edit: March 15, 2012, 03:09:25 pm by nxtboy III
»
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #20 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:10:11 pm »
When I say buffer, I mean, in this case, that if you were to display it, you would see all the hitboxes.
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #21 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:13:43 pm »
So it is as if each buffer is a layer of the screen?
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #22 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:15:49 pm »
Exactly
I was going to call it a layer, but I decided not to to avoid some confusion. But yes, that is how I think of it
I think of them as layers of the screen and you are just pixel testing what is underneath.
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #23 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:17:40 pm »
I wish I could create buffers on my NXT...
But that is basically what a map is for a tile-based game. A layer.
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #24 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:19:26 pm »
Eh, I think of tilemaps as just being able to get detailed pixels and showing the detail by blowing it up in scale. When you are still checking a tilemap, you are just "pixel testing" it, but getting more than a 1 or 0 result.
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #25 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:23:45 pm »
I have another question/problem:
In my pixel-perfect game, there are enemies. When you move up, everything else moves down, since it scrolls. Which also means the enemies move down. But a lot of times I have a problem that the enemies aren't in the exact position they are supposed to be. They might be one pixel off. I think it is because the velocity of player increases as you go down. Same with the enemies. Somehow it is messing up the enemy's Y position. How can I fix this??
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #26 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:25:12 pm »
Are you applying the same acceleration to the enemies? Also, do you have FP support, or just integers?
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
nxtboy III
LV8
Addict (Next: 1000)
Posts: 795
Rating: +26/-1
NXT!
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #27 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:26:50 pm »
Yes, I am applying acceleration to the enemies, but only on the Y axis. Same with the character. And yes, floating point is supported.
Logged
Need some help with levels PLEASE!!
Xeda112358
they/them
Moderator
LV12
Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
Posts: 4704
Rating: +719/-6
Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #28 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:30:13 pm »
Ah, okay, try starting both you and the enemies at a half pixel location. That is the way I solved it before
Logged
My pastebin
|
Pokémon Amber
|
Grammer Programming Language
|
BatLib Library
|
Jade Simulator
|
Zeda's Hex Opcodes
|
FileSyst Library
|
CopyProg
|
TPROG
|
GroupRead
|
Lbl Read/Write
|
Z80 Floating Point Routines
(
z80float on GitHub
)|
Z80 Optimized Routines Repository
Builderboy
Physics Guru
CoT Emeritus
LV13
Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
Posts: 5673
Rating: +613/-9
Would you kindly?
Re: Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test
«
Reply #29 on:
March 15, 2012, 03:33:08 pm »
Your problem might be this, your code might be doing things in the wrong order, such as:
Move Player
Update Screen
Move enemies
As you can see, in this example the enemies only get moved *after* the screen is updated, so they will always be 1 frame behind in their animation. Might this be what is happening to you?
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
...
6
Go Up
« previous
next »
Omnimaga
»
Forum
»
Calculator Community
»
TI Calculators
»
General Calculator Help
»
Some limitations of platformers using pxl-test