0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
This looks like another one of those things that multiple people would benefit from
Darn, I wish the cables were the same. My old 83+ cable is almost completely broken now so if it stops working forever, I'm gonna be stuck with like 4 Casio cables.
Got a working multimeter today and was able to test it.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/Jack_plug.png/300px-Jack_plug.pngThe sleeves (labeled as 1) are connected.The tip (3) is connected to the ring (2) on the other side. Same both ways.Looks to me like the 'data lines' are swapped...EDIT: ndless to say I don't have a TI cable to do the same test with...but I'm suspecting that with TI cables, the tip on one side is connected to the other and the ring is connected to the ring. w00t.
Quote from: Darl181 on May 16, 2011, 06:28:15 pmI think, what might make it work, would be some sort of hook that intercepts the stuff sent to/received from the link port, and virtually swap the tip and ring.You can't cause the input from port 0 to change, though. That's how the OS gets the state of the link lines, after all. And also, you would have to switch the inputs/outputs on exactly one of the calculators.
I think, what might make it work, would be some sort of hook that intercepts the stuff sent to/received from the link port, and virtually swap the tip and ring.
Quote from: graphmastur on May 07, 2011, 03:56:05 pmI'm pretty sure Qwerty.55 has both calcs, and has messed with that.I talked with him on IRC last night, he didn't mention messing with it but when I can I'm going to get a multimeter and find out what input for what part goes where.
I'm pretty sure Qwerty.55 has both calcs, and has messed with that.
Bump. With the contest over, hopefully there's more time for someone to do something like this.