0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ScoutDavid on November 29, 2010, 07:21:24 amGood for the topic to be merged Serious companies such as Microsoft and Google have it all documented:7.0.517.44This is my version of Google Chrome (the latest), it's huge, so I think they really care about this number, though.Just to let you know (in case you wanted a newer version), 8.0.552.210 is out And yeah, a lot of really big products use long numbers. Kinda overdoing it for a calculator project, though. A.BB.CCC or something like that seems pretty good already.
Good for the topic to be merged Serious companies such as Microsoft and Google have it all documented:7.0.517.44This is my version of Google Chrome (the latest), it's huge, so I think they really care about this number, though.
Yeah, generally first number is for major updates, second one for minor updates and third one for even smaller updates, such as fixing a typo or small bug. I generally stick to 2 numbers.Btw wasn't there another topic about version numbers elsewhere? I merged the 3rd one started by Scout but I swear there was a longer one...
What is the abcd part of the title? Obviously understand version numbers and completion percent, but abcd?
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on November 30, 2010, 02:16:52 amYeah, generally first number is for major updates, second one for minor updates and third one for even smaller updates, such as fixing a typo or small bug. I generally stick to 2 numbers.Btw wasn't there another topic about version numbers elsewhere? I merged the 3rd one started by Scout but I swear there was a longer one... Yeah, it's here: http://ourl.ca/7279Another merge?
I like to use letters for versions of programs that aren't really updates, like different candidates for people to try out.
Yeah, Greek letter titles are pretty widely accepted. Pre-Alpha for bleeding-edge, Alpha for the first working versions (that might still have major bugs), Beta for new versions that should be pretty stable but need to be tested to get rid of bugs, etc. It's all what the programmer decides, of course, but people should stick to conventions like these, at least for titles (so some user wouldn't download an Epsilon thinking it's pretty stable, then get BSoD/BLoD).
I never saw anyone other than Quigibo use Delta or Gamma instead of Beta and Alpha before, though...In Ndless case, it seems ExtendeD is using the same version number as the OS it runs on, now, followed with another number. Example Ndless 1.1 is for OS 1.1, Ndless 1.7 for OS 1.7 and Ndless 2.0 for OS 2.0 (there are exceptions, though, such as Ndless 1.0)
I never saw anyone other than Quigibo use Delta or Gamma instead of Beta and Alpha before, though...