0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Just because our human minds cannot understand the existence of God does not mean he does not exist.
Somehow believing in no God is a religion too, since you have no proof he doesn't exist. (Although evolution is an attempt).
In order for me to believe something, I require evidence; that's just how my mind works.I would not say that evolution and Christianity are equal in that they both are believed in by faith. Evolution is not blind faith; there is massive support and evidence for it.Fine, evolution is a theory, but people often misinterpret "theory" for just a guess. A scientific theory actually very comprehensive and is tested and confirmed repeatedly. There is tons of evidence for evolution that can be seen in both living and dead creatures.Also, theists frequently say that there must be a first cause to start everything, so therefore it must be God.Even if there is some supernatural creator to set the universe in motion, how do you know that it is the Christian god? It could be any other supernatural being.I also find that this is somewhat saying, "Science doesn't know, therefore God."If we don't know something, it isn't very reasonable to conclude that it must be because of God. I'd instead rather search harder and attempt to find an explanation that can actually be supported. Even if an explanation can never be found by science, I'd rather leave that gap of knowledge empty as opposed to filling it with religion
"welcome to the world of computers, where everything seems to be based on random number generators"
Quote from: epic7 on May 21, 2013, 05:16:55 pmIn order for me to believe something, I require evidence; that's just how my mind works.I would not say that evolution and Christianity are equal in that they both are believed in by faith. Evolution is not blind faith; there is massive support and evidence for it.Fine, evolution is a theory, but people often misinterpret "theory" for just a guess. A scientific theory actually very comprehensive and is tested and confirmed repeatedly. There is tons of evidence for evolution that can be seen in both living and dead creatures.Also, theists frequently say that there must be a first cause to start everything, so therefore it must be God.Even if there is some supernatural creator to set the universe in motion, how do you know that it is the Christian god? It could be any other supernatural being.I also find that this is somewhat saying, "Science doesn't know, therefore God."If we don't know something, it isn't very reasonable to conclude that it must be because of God. I'd instead rather search harder and attempt to find an explanation that can actually be supported. Even if an explanation can never be found by science, I'd rather leave that gap of knowledge empty as opposed to filling it with religionThere is very little, almost no evidence for evolution, and most of the published "evidence" is either fake or turns out to be something totally different than what they and not support the theory of evolution at all (or in some cases, actually refute it). On the other hand, there is overwhelming evidence for creation and God, which isn't fake, and has not been proven to be something else.Also, if there is a God, then there is proof that he is a Christian God. He has to be omnipotent, He has to be all-merciful, and He has to be all-Good. Nothing good can come from an evil creator.
There is very little, almost no evidence for evolution, and most of the published "evidence" is either fake or turns out to be something totally different than what they and not support the theory of evolution at all (or in some cases, actually refute it). On the other hand, there is overwhelming evidence for creation and God, which isn't fake, and has not been proven to be something else.
Also, if there is a God, then there is proof that he is a Christian God. He has to be omnipotent, He has to be all-merciful, and He has to be all-Good. Nothing good can come from an evil creator.
Quote from: harold on May 21, 2013, 02:46:38 pmOk, fine. So he was always there? Or just appeared? But it doesn't really matter anyway. I just threw that into the mix because I thought it would be an interesting alternative.That's all it will be anyway - potentially interesting thoughts. None of it can be verified.The concept of something creating itself is interesting, right? Well at least I think so.He couldn't appear because according to the religious, He's the inventor of the time. So He was "always" here.And you're theory isn't really interesting because it's impossible. A think can't create itself, since it has to already exist to do so.
Ok, fine. So he was always there? Or just appeared? But it doesn't really matter anyway. I just threw that into the mix because I thought it would be an interesting alternative.That's all it will be anyway - potentially interesting thoughts. None of it can be verified.The concept of something creating itself is interesting, right? Well at least I think so.
There are a few things I've been wondering about religion, particularly Christianity:Have different old/new testaments been created for Protestant religion than Catholic, as well as other derivatives of Christianity?Else, are they identical and what about other religions based on Christianity, like Jehovah's Wisdoms?God created everything... What about the TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition? Since God has supposedly created "everything", this would imply that he created every calculator too, right?Also, does this includes people's thoughts, religion debates, states of mind and ways of expressing ourselves, such as acrostics?Moreover, has God created science (well, the fact that it works) or even every other religion too?Ending this with saying that if God has really created everything I mentioned above, then I can't imagine how our universe would look like if he made division by zero possible...
Also, it seems that religious people tend to generate excuses to dismissively get rid of any challenges. For example"How was God created?""He wasn't. End of story."
Quote from: epic7 on May 21, 2013, 09:00:40 pmAlso, it seems that religious people tend to generate excuses to dismissively get rid of any challenges. For example"How was God created?""He wasn't. End of story."I actually find that to be a rather neat argument. Like harold said earlier, it is definitely interesting to think about something that is seemingly impossible (like something creating itself). At the least, it is a really creative exercise in logic, and at best, you might be shocked to learn that it is completely possible (this is how some scientific theories were stumbled upon, I believe).So what if something "created itself?" What limitations would it have? I would posit that it wouldn't be restricted. It could be something simple, unthinking, or it could be something all powerful. This is not at all proof of a God-- this would be like saying, "if wizards existed, they could perform magic, so therefor magic must exist" without proving that wizards exist. However, for somebody that believes in a god or gods, this might serve as a plausible explanation. For the rest, this is just a fun exercise
When you're speaking about logic, what is logic about the big bang the appears from nowhere ? It's impossible, it must have an origin. Nothing can be its own origine.
God lives forever and fromever, that's all. There's no origin to his life. He invented time, so you can't apply to him this notion.
Ok. So then this can be said:"How was the world created?""It wasn't. End of story."No need for God then.Note: I am still not saying "don't believe in God", you believe in anything you want. I just say that God is a possibility but only a possibility among others, maybe there is a God, maybe not, maybe there are two Gods, I don't know
This is not at all proof of a God-- this would be like saying, "if wizards existed, they could perform magic, so therefor magic must exist" without proving that wizards exist.