0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Uhhhh....wrong numbering?
Quote from: Galandros on June 23, 2010, 05:06:48 am15- It would be epic fail16- The OS must have bugs17- It would have stupid C code and even weirder hand written x86 assembly18- would not support multitasking on old CPUs without threads or multiple cores, more than 8-bit sound or colour graphics25) It wouldn't even natively support color. You'd have to write programs to make it display colors.
15- It would be epic fail16- The OS must have bugs17- It would have stupid C code and even weirder hand written x86 assembly18- would not support multitasking on old CPUs without threads or multiple cores, more than 8-bit sound or colour graphics
Quote from: FinaleTI on June 23, 2010, 11:09:01 amQuote from: Galandros on June 23, 2010, 05:06:48 am15- It would be epic fail16- The OS must have bugs17- It would have stupid C code and even weirder hand written x86 assembly18- would not support multitasking on old CPUs without threads or multiple cores, more than 8-bit sound or colour graphics25) It wouldn't even natively support color. You'd have to write programs to make it display colors.130: The only way to get colors would be if you fried the LCD.
Quote from: Deep Thought on November 23, 2010, 09:52:18 amQuote from: FinaleTI on June 23, 2010, 11:09:01 amQuote from: Galandros on June 23, 2010, 05:06:48 am15- It would be epic fail16- The OS must have bugs17- It would have stupid C code and even weirder hand written x86 assembly18- would not support multitasking on old CPUs without threads or multiple cores, more than 8-bit sound or colour graphics25) It wouldn't even natively support color. You'd have to write programs to make it display colors.130: The only way to get colors would be if you fried the LCD.132. or pressed the screen really hard