lol

I don't remember, its been a while since I did HTML, but it is very, very redundant.

I saw this from thedailywtf.com
Very amusing

wow at the source o.o

From the looks of this source, I assume nesting 9000 <strong>s won't do much?

oh wow, lol.

Also, <strong> and <b> (bold) are similar but different. Both render the text as bold but <b> is visual and <strong> is visual-auditory. For people who are blind or have very poor vision, there are softwares that will read aloud the contents of a screen. Such softwares would read "a <b>bad</b> day" with constant intonation and put emphasis on "bad" in "a <strong>bad</strong> day". This also holds true with <i> and <em> in the same respect.

At least, that's how it's supposed to work.

oh wow, that formatted badly, let me try that again

<strong> and <b> (bold) are similar but different. Both render the text as bold but <b> is visual and <strong> is visual-auditory. For people who are blind or have very poor vision, there are softwares that will read aloud the contents of a screen. Such softwares would read "a <b>bad</b> day" with constant intonation and put emphasis on "bad" in "a <strong>bad</strong> day". This also holds true with <i> and <em> in the same respect.

At least, that's how it's supposed to work.