Let's see which console between the Xbox 360, PS3 and Atari 2600 are better, from a different point of view:

Xbox 360 pros:
-None

Xbox 360 cons:
-Breaks often (often after less than 5 year)
-The majority of games suck because they only focus on graphics or are too easy
-Most games aren't games but rather slow-paced movies (10 hours of cutscenes and 5 minutes of gameplay)
-Graphics are so detailled that they're make games too complex (can't distinguish items from landscape)
-Text is nearly impossible to read on 480p TVs
-Can't be emulated on a calculator
-Too heavy
-Too big
-Region-locked


PS3 pros:
-Older models can be used to cook eggs after several hours of play
-Can be used for weight lifting at the gym.
-Free online multiplayer, without the screaming 10 years old kids seen on Xbox Live who absolutely want to show you that they have a mic.

PS3 cons:
-Same as Xbox 360, but doesn't break as often as it used to do
-If you jailbreak your console, you can go to jail


Atari 2600 Pros:
-After 30 years, your console still works great without repair!
-Aside from the original 6-switch model, the console isn't too heavy
-Much smaller than the 360, despite dating back in the '70s
-Has a game based on the E.T. movie
-Has adult games
-Sound is loud enough
-Looks good on most TVs rather than just HDTVs
-Not region-locked (except some games might not play on other region consoles)
-You can see how Xbox 360 games look like when you're high, but without having to purchase drugs, and if you play X-Man or E.T you can even feel the side effects!
-Could be emulated on a calculator if you poke Calc84maniac often enough

Atari 2600 Cons:
-None

Conclusion: The greater the number (2600>360>3), the better the console. Discuss!