Author Topic: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!  (Read 21332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ralphdspam

  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • ********
  • Posts: 841
  • Rating: +38/-1
  • My name is actually Matt.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2011, 01:26:45 pm »
Is anyone really going to make a quadratic solver for April 1?  I am planning to. :P
ld a, 0
ld a, a

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2011, 01:33:32 pm »
I plan to :D I am trying to figure out how to combine a tunnel game and quadratic solver, though :D

Offline leafy

  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1554
  • Rating: +475/-97
  • Seizon senryakuuuu!
    • View Profile
    • keff.me
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2011, 02:40:01 pm »
Yeah the quadratic solver has to run crysis :P
In-progress: Graviter (...)

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2011, 07:26:28 am »
I think imma try to make crazy one either.
(Quad + Random Battle.... XD )
Sig wipe!

Offline turiqwalrus

  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • ********
  • Posts: 840
  • Rating: +51/-2
  • Wheeeeeee~!
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2011, 08:13:04 am »
I'll make a racing quadsolver.
the 'rank' you get is the A, the time you take(in frames) is the B, and the number of times crashed into something is a C
I'll start now.

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2011, 12:23:10 am »
We have today and tomorrow left! I should quit slacking!

Offline leafy

  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1554
  • Rating: +475/-97
  • Seizon senryakuuuu!
    • View Profile
    • keff.me
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2011, 12:57:43 am »
Is there a competition or something?
In-progress: Graviter (...)

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2011, 07:10:43 am »
I think it's just for April Fool's day XD
Sig wipe!

Offline Compynerd255

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 336
  • Rating: +53/-4
  • Betafreak Games
    • View Profile
    • Betafreak Games
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2011, 10:33:17 am »
I plan to :D I am trying to figure out how to combine a tunnel game and quadratic solver, though :D
Here's an idea: ask for the coefficients, and the program will find the roots. You will then be required to GUESS the roots that it solved, and if you get it wrong, you will have to survive in the tunnel for 10 seconds. Oh, and to be even more evil: to guess the number, the tunnel will expand and split into the digits, and you have to travel through the hole that corresponds to the digit you want to guess.
The Slime: On Hold, preparing to add dynamic tiles

Axe Eitrix: DONE

Betafreak Games: Fun filled games for XBox and PC. Check it out at http://www.betafreak.com



Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2011, 10:38:14 am »
Yeah the quadratic solver has to run crysis :P

Someone should mod Runer's insane tunnel game to be a quadratic solver (with his permission) :P
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2011, 11:33:56 am »
so what do I do with quad solvers that I made?
Where do I post?
Sig wipe!

Offline ralphdspam

  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • ********
  • Posts: 841
  • Rating: +38/-1
  • My name is actually Matt.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2011, 11:38:46 am »
Just post them on ticalc.org.  You can link to them on this topic. :)
ld a, 0
ld a, a

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2011, 11:39:57 am »
oh XP
*yeongJIN_COOL is posting some crazy quad solver
Sig wipe!

Offline ralphdspam

  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • ********
  • Posts: 841
  • Rating: +38/-1
  • My name is actually Matt.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2011, 08:52:43 pm »
I posted my solver, but I have a feeling it will be denied. :\
ld a, 0
ld a, a

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: We Need More Quadratic Solvers!!!
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2011, 09:12:40 pm »
Hehe, I am putting on the finishing touches to mine... I didn't actually make anything special, though :/ It is just a slow process selecting the coefficients... I plan to make some way where you need to input your values to begin with, then your selected coefficients are used to find the roots and then depending on how accurate your two inputs are will determine how accurate the output result is :D