Author Topic: KnightOS  (Read 205670 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #570 on: November 27, 2010, 04:12:33 pm »
I'm glad that it's an svn now. Once eeems and I get oasis to compile an os and such, it woukd be interesting to be able to work on kos. That gives me an idea for oasis...</offtopic>

I think the header is fine. It's not like you have to scroll for 10 minutes to see anything. Sircmpwn, good luck with this project. I looked over the boot code a little, and it looks nice.

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #571 on: November 27, 2010, 07:52:42 pm »
EDIT: Why am I not mentioned at all on the site? D':
I'm sorry, that should be fixed now.

Sir, you might want to fix the Omni/Cemetech/Ticalc links on the sidebar, though. They lead to the wrong locations. :P
Fixed.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #572 on: November 27, 2010, 07:53:34 pm »
EDIT: Why am I not mentioned at all on the site? D':
I'm sorry, that should be fixed now.

Sir, you might want to fix the Omni/Cemetech/Ticalc links on the sidebar, though. They lead to the wrong locations. :P
Fixed.

Great. Also, why isn't my name referred too? hahah, j/k

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #573 on: November 27, 2010, 07:55:03 pm »
Come to think of it, I'm a tester/dev, and I've bothered you more than anyone else, I think. ;-) Just saying.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #574 on: November 27, 2010, 07:56:00 pm »
Come to think of it, I'm a tester/dev, and I've bothered you more than anyone else, I think. ;-) Just saying.

* ScoutDavid wonders about hacking Sir's website to put his name there

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #575 on: November 27, 2010, 08:01:30 pm »
* ScoutDavid wonders about hacking Sir's website to put his name there
I'd love to see you try.

Come to think of it, I'm a tester/dev, and I've bothered you more than anyone else, I think. ;-) Just saying.
Which I appreciate.  Really.

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #576 on: November 27, 2010, 08:06:56 pm »
Come to think of it, I'm a tester/dev, and I've bothered you more than anyone else, I think. ;-) Just saying.
Which I appreciate.  Really.
Lol. Hey, just giving you that positive encouragement!

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #577 on: November 27, 2010, 08:08:14 pm »
Multithreading is your fault.  So is flash control.  You bug me too much :P

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #578 on: November 27, 2010, 09:16:51 pm »
Multithreading is your fault.  So is flash control.  You bug me too much :P
An i need to edit tht post later to fix the quote. I would hope flash control is my fault. I'm glad to see multithreadin is too. ;-) i'm studying the ports for the usb protocol to help you there. (along with the bcalls of course)

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #579 on: November 27, 2010, 09:57:45 pm »
I would worship you if you took care of USB ;)

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #580 on: November 27, 2010, 10:20:16 pm »
Sounds good. I'll try my best to learn it. A few of tge bcalls should still be on a protected page, so it makes life easier.  If i could get my hands on a better decompiler, i could figure it out better.

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #581 on: November 27, 2010, 10:36:05 pm »
I believe that there is a full disassembly on http://www.brandonw.net/calcstuff

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #582 on: November 27, 2010, 10:37:18 pm »
I believe that there is a full disassembly on http://www.brandonw.net/calcstuff
Which is the current one i'm using, actually. Thanks, though.

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #583 on: November 28, 2010, 08:15:39 pm »
Update
I just implemented thread freezing in KnightOS, so that the OS can freeze threads when the loose focus. Frozen threads are not executed. Threads can also specify whether or not they are freezable, and will not be frozen if they specify otherwise. I also made it quite a bit easier for threads to access their thread flags.

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: KnightOS
« Reply #584 on: November 28, 2010, 09:11:22 pm »
Cool! That sounds really useful, and definitely power-saving. (speed-wise at least)