Author Topic: Math! (and that is not a factorial)  (Read 17919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: Math! (and that is not a factorial)
« Reply #45 on: December 11, 2012, 05:39:08 pm »
oh. what was I thinking? XP
I was thinking of multiplying 2 by "both" sides :x
* yeongJIN_COOL hides
Sig wipe!

Offline stevon8ter

  • LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
  • *******
  • Posts: 663
  • Rating: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Math! (and that is not a factorial)
« Reply #46 on: December 11, 2012, 05:51:32 pm »
2^15 /= 32.    2^5 = 32 xD
Little typo....
None of my posts are meant offending... I you feel hurt by one of my posts, tell me ... So i can appoligise me and/or explain why i posted it


Hi there, I'm the allmighty (read as: stupid, weak...) STEVON8TER

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: Math! (and that is not a factorial)
« Reply #47 on: December 11, 2012, 05:56:28 pm »
Hehe, thanks, I just fixed it XD

EDIT: Oh, and I will at some point have to make a post about this and how it works:

I also extended it to other denominators recently, not just powers of two (though those are a bit easier). With other denominators, it has the interesting ability to compute all the smaller integers relatively prime to the numerator.

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: Math! (and that is not a factorial)
« Reply #48 on: December 12, 2012, 10:20:44 am »
As a little update on my most recent proof, I spent the last half hour of so on my statistics exam generalising the proof further. Instead of using 2x, you can use any function that diverges to infinity as x goes to infinity. And to further generalise, given that lim x→infinity of g(x) goes to infinity, then lim x→infinity of g(x)sin(k/g(x))=k. However, using g(x)=2x reveals the neat identity with the nested radicals :)

Also, g(x)tan(k/g(x))=k as x→infinity. It converges to k from above, whereas the sine version converges from below. The reason is simple : g(x)tan(k/g(x))=g(x)sin(k/g(x))/cos(k/g(x)). As x→infinty, this converges to g(x)sin(k/g(x))/1=g(x)sin(k/g(x)) XD

I also created a really complicated looking problem that evaluated to the partial sum of k2, too, just for fun. I used:

lim a→inf sum(e2k+1sin2(k*e-2k),k,a,n+a)

Hehe ^_^
EDIT: In the last equation, I had to replace the 'x' with 'k' :P Also, a prettier image is attached.
EDIT2: In the picture, pretend I put the 2 symbol for sin2() >.>