You need to do a little math, huh. On the highly unlikely chance that you actually have come up with something original, go get it published. A much more jarring reality, perhaps, is that nobody wants to steal an incorrect and underdeveloped theory (how can you claim to represent the universe if you don't deal with quantum mechanics, I wonder)

If you explained your brilliant revelation in layman's terms, maybe I'd be more inclined to believe you.

As am I.

Well, not a theory yet, I suppose...

However mine does explain a few things...

Here it is:

Instead of the current big bang model, thinking that all matter went in straight lines, and the infinitely dense mass in the center is no longer there, think this:

1) The center is still there, because infinity minus any finite number is still infinity. This works because there is finite space in the universe, so there can not be infinite matter in the universe unless the universe was infinitely dense, except in the center, because the center is infinitely dense and has infinite matter in a smaller space than the universe. In my hypothesis, it's actually a wormhole that leads to a different universe (not a dimension, remember that).

2) Because it's a wormhole, it spins, and in fact is quite large. This means that it either at its creation, the big bang had enough force to counteract the infinite gravity and go in an outwards spiral orbit instead of a straight path one due to the rotating nature of a wormhole, or is spouting out matter from another universe with enough force to counteract the infinite gravity and go in an outwards spiral orbit.

Q/A:

Q: How is the gravity infinite?

A: Infinite mass = infinite gravity, no matter what the distance in our universe.

Q: How is this possible to counteract infinite gravity?

A: With a force infinity^n where n>1 running perpendicular to the gravitational force, causing an outwards spiral orbit. (I thank my calc teacher for telling me that inf^1 and inf^2 are different, but not inf and 2inf)

Reasoning:

The masses of the universe are still attracting each other, yet still expand (found that in Stephan Hawking's book, a brief history of time).

If all mass left the big bang with a linear path with a force infinity^n where n>1, then there would be 0 relative velocity because placing infinity in the velocity by force equation, you get infinite velocity, so nothing would be able to form an orbit (caused by different relative velocities not being 0)

There's a lot of misconception surrounding the Big Bang, and it's not an explosion from a point, it's an explosion of spacetime which happened at all space and all time (akin to a phase change, although the universe was arguably smaller back then). Spacetime came from the Big Bang, not the other way around.