Author Topic: Pitagoric Triplet  (Read 11808 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2011, 08:41:38 pm »
:P We discussed this on IRC

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2011, 10:20:29 pm »
Does a proof that it's not possible count?
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2011, 07:14:25 am »
I like what Zeda did, at least, I get most of it :)

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2011, 01:26:33 pm »
Does a proof that it's not possible count?

Sure. Post a full, formal proof here.




Offline Goplat

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 289
  • Rating: +82/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2011, 07:07:35 pm »
Here's a harder one: Find natural numbers a, b, and c where a3+b3=c3 :P

03 + 03 = 03

And yes, 0 is a natural number. The standard way to define the natural numbers in modern mathematics is to represent 0 with the empty set, 1 as the set {0}, 2 as the set {0,1}, etc.
Numquam te deseram; numquam te deficiam; numquam circa curram et te desolabo
Numquam te plorare faciam; numquam valedicam; numquam mendacium dicam et te vulnerabo

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Pitagoric Triplet
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2011, 07:25:12 pm »
That's defining the cardinality as a number, which it does not appear to be. For example, the cardinality of the set of natural numbers is infinity. The cardinality of the set of real numbers is of a greater infinity. If cardinality are real numbers, then would there not be multiple types of natural infinities?
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 07:25:34 pm by Qwerty.55 »
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ