Author Topic: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.  (Read 3918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BOB!

  • Guest
Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« on: March 17, 2011, 03:20:44 am »
Which is harder? i say Riemann Hypothesize.
i wont troll again.
its not solved yet ,+ it sounds nice.

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2011, 03:26:44 am »
Well, both Fermat's last theorem  and the Poincare conjecture have been solved, so that'd make the Riemann hypothesis the most difficult by default.
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2011, 03:32:55 am »
I dunno, I've dabbled a little in the area of the Riemann Hypothesis and while it twists my brain into knots, I kind of feel like my brain can handle it. Maybe when it is solved we will take a look at it and realise that it was so much easier to prove than Fermat's Last Theorem :D Who knows?

BOB!

  • Guest
Re: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2011, 03:44:48 am »
i dunno(dont know not Duh No) but i still guess reimann hypothesis even if it was solved.
i mean there all easy problems its just humans cant handle em. ;D but of course there all utterly impossible for almost every human even euler but dunno about gauss.
poncares got a 250 page solution about 100 bigger than that of Fermat.......
and WOW Xeda you've actually dabbled it ,attempted it YOURSELF? ??? ???  O.O but ...uh didn't you know it was sort of hard........and it would be groundbreaking.......
i cant even understood Boiincavae.
is it Poncarae or Boiincavae

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2011, 03:48:32 am »
On accident, I did. But that was because I was working with divergent series/sums and coming up with an algorithm to find the equation to them. According to my profs I was meddling with the Riemann Zeta function and Riemann Hypothesis.

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Reimann Hypothesis Vs. Fermats Last Theorem Vs. Boincavae.
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2011, 04:01:30 am »
i cant even understood Boiincavae.
is it Poncarae or Boiincavae

"Poincaré conjecture," even though it's not technically a conjecture at this point. It's actually very simple, if you don't get too far into the details of it. Basically, that the PC says is that if you take a closed surface* and put a loop around it, the object is topologically equivalent to a sphere if any arbitrary loop can be contracted to a single point on the surface. In other words, the surface can be deformed without "breaking it" in such a way that it becomes a sphere. This is a very rough conceptual image of what it says, but it's close enough for most purposes.

*essentially just if you take a sheet of something with no holes in it to see the inside, like a hollow sphere.
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ