0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
What's wrong with it? I think it looks more streamlined and modern than the TI calcs.
Honestly, as long as the calc is small enough and programmable, I don't care if it's ugly (which is just a matter of opinion).
What does a color screen matter if the calc is hard to use? ive heard that casios are very hard to use
I have to agree with ScoutDavid about the look of the Casio. I don't care much about how the buttons are arranged though. It will be like switching from an 84 to an 89 in my opinion. I just with it could keep the shape of a TI calculator. But right now, I just thought of something that probably belongs elsewhere. What is up with TI? Can you imagine how much business they would have if they just made a device that wasn't necessarily a calculator that we could program. I mean, it might not be allowed on exams, but we would program them and turn them into the best pieces of technology out there. All they need to do is give us the info and produce the devices. Add some more memory and a color screen, make it pretty much the TI-84 and we can make it amazing. They wouldn't need to waste any more time on software updates or anything, we practically take care of it anyway!
Ahhhg! Hex will BURN HAHAHAHA You're that person form UTI that likes Hex, right? Trust me, it's cool, but you're not gonna make a ASM game in it But if you like it, go ahead I will program my 84+ plus as well after this, because I doubt that the C sdk will be on-calc, so I will probably only program my prizm at home.