0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
what happens if you press mode and try to look at the clock? does it crash, or just output garbage?
TI should get a new programming team
Quote from: yeongJIN_COOL on January 11, 2011, 05:02:55 pmTI should get a new programming teamIt's probably not a team anymore.
In fact, it's very unstable on a basic TI-83+, as the 2.55MP OS is using 48Kb RAM (and the basic TI-83+ only has 32Kb RAM).But it works on a TI-83+SE (128Kb RAM).So you can upgrade your TI-83+SE to a TI-84+SE with the patch (without the clock and the USB obviously).
Quote from: critor on January 11, 2011, 06:04:38 pmIn fact, it's very unstable on a basic TI-83+, as the 2.55MP OS is using 48Kb RAM (and the basic TI-83+ only has 32Kb RAM).But it works on a TI-83+SE (128Kb RAM).So you can upgrade your TI-83+SE to a TI-84+SE with the patch (without the clock and the USB obviously).Nice!
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on January 11, 2011, 07:12:26 pmQuote from: critor on January 11, 2011, 06:04:38 pmIn fact, it's very unstable on a basic TI-83+, as the 2.55MP OS is using 48Kb RAM (and the basic TI-83+ only has 32Kb RAM).But it works on a TI-83+SE (128Kb RAM).So you can upgrade your TI-83+SE to a TI-84+SE with the patch (without the clock and the USB obviously).Nice! So you can install this on a 83+? That's nice.
I don't remember the boot code having a downgrade protection feature. Even if it did, it would have to be certificate-based. A certificate-based restriction could easily be undone by restoring your certificate from an older backup. What? You don't keep backups of your certificate? Shame.Also, the TI-Boy issue can be solved by first copying the extra OS page to the 32 K sector, and then proceeding as normal. For that matter, you could patch the new OS to use that dang 32 K sector instead.