that reminds me, i'm curious. those who thought recoil was too easy, did you play on a 6mhz or 15mhz calc?

that reminds me, i'm curious. those who thought recoil was too easy, did you play on a 6mhz or 15mhz calc?

15 MHz. It could have been a bit more difficult.

Both of these games are incredible and they will each be going on my calc.
When's voting closing?  I'm going to wait until after I've played them each on my calc before making a decision.

Wonderful job Nemo and Finale!

Here are my thoughts:

Recoil by Nemo:
I really liked this game; it had about all you could want in a tunnel, plus lasers.  It may start out easy, but it gets much harder as the game goes on.  Excellent game.

Collision Course by FinaleTI:
Fun game, but really frustrating.  It took my 35 losses before I finally won one, and 20 more losses before I won another.  Though I think the concept and speed were better than Recoil, the brutal difficulty made it hard to play.  It had superior graphics and I really liked the Stats.   Great game.

Verdict:
This was really, really close.  I'm enjoying both of them.  Unfortunately, I had to pick one, so due to the difficulty of Collision Course, I choose Recoil.

One more day of judging.

Wow. I didn't expect Collision Course to be that hard... I'll have to add an easier difficulty in.
As a question though, those who found Collision Course extremely hard, did you play in Wabbit or on real hardware? I'm just wondering, because I don't think it's too fast on hardware (but then again, I made it, so...), but on Wabbit, I have to slow it down to play easily.

I only played on wabbit. I retract all my comments about the speed being too hard...on hardware it's fine

Kay. I'll most likely be adding an easier difficulty, which will probably slow it down a little and make the tunnel bigger. Plus, if I do add multiplayer, it'll probably end up being slower, just cause it needs to swap variables.