Suggestion: Image parsing, if you can do it, and it's not too stupid an idea

Please elaborate on what you mean by it?

Oh I like it

As for image parsing I think he means like on TI-Planet, where if you paste an image URL, it automatically shows the image instead of the link.

Hmm, the problem with that is if people post pr0n.
That is something that is easily done. I'll add it in and make it an option that has to be enabled (so disabled by default).

Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on May 27, 2013, 12:09:33 am

Oh I like it

As for image parsing I think he means like on TI-Planet, where if you paste an image URL, it automatically shows the image instead of the link.

Hmm, the problem with that is if people post pr0n.
That is something that is easily done. I'll add it in and make it an option that has to be enabled (so disabled by default).

Indeed, I am not too fond of the idea.

Although people here most likely won't go to such extent, but there is still the issue about large images (in file size and dimensions). Some people don't bother about others who have slow connections or computers and might randomly post pictures of their 3840x2160 wallpapers or ridiculously large animated screenshots.

At least for questionable but tolerated content, we can post a link and warn people that it's NSFW.

Besides, having to scroll even longer to read text above images will be annoying. >.<

Quote from: Eeems on May 27, 2013, 12:15:59 am

Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on May 27, 2013, 12:09:33 am

Oh I like it

As for image parsing I think he means like on TI-Planet, where if you paste an image URL, it automatically shows the image instead of the link.

Hmm, the problem with that is if people post pr0n.
That is something that is easily done. I'll add it in and make it an option that has to be enabled (so disabled by default).

Indeed, I am not too fond of the idea.

Although people here most likely won't go to such extent, but there is still the issue about large images (in file size and dimensions). Some people don't bother about others who have slow connections or computers and might randomly post pictures of their 3840x2160 wallpapers or ridiculously large animated screenshots.

At least for questionable but tolerated content, we can post a link and warn people that it's NSFW.

Besides, having to scroll even longer to read text above images will be annoying. >.<

How about have the server resize the image before sending it to the client?

Quote from: Sorunome on May 27, 2013, 03:23:14 pm

Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on May 27, 2013, 12:22:08 am

Quote from: Eeems on May 27, 2013, 12:15:59 am

Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on May 27, 2013, 12:09:33 am

Oh I like it

As for image parsing I think he means like on TI-Planet, where if you paste an image URL, it automatically shows the image instead of the link.

Hmm, the problem with that is if people post pr0n.
That is something that is easily done. I'll add it in and make it an option that has to be enabled (so disabled by default).

Indeed, I am not too fond of the idea.

Although people here most likely won't go to such extent, but there is still the issue about large images (in file size and dimensions). Some people don't bother about others who have slow connections or computers and might randomly post pictures of their 3840x2160 wallpapers or ridiculously large animated screenshots.

At least for questionable but tolerated content, we can post a link and warn people that it's NSFW.

Besides, having to scroll even longer to read text above images will be annoying. >.<

How about have the server resize the image before sending it to the client?

Storage space issues would make this harder to do. Feel free to request it in https://github.com/Omnimaga/OmnomIRC3/issues/7 though.

i never talked about storing the images, i thought more about using it as a little proxy for images which also scales 'em down

Note to self: add that ' and " also determines the ends of urls

Yeah I agree. At first I thought it was broken until you mentionned that it was hidden

I would never really notice the actual tabs. I just noticed some stuff hiding themselves slightly (which were already hidden at around 90% by the time the page is loaded)