0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
TI-BASIC would probably be simpler than Asm.
Quote from: JosJuice on October 24, 2010, 01:57:49 amTI-BASIC would probably be simpler than Asm.No, because for BASIC, you would basically need the entire OS. In other words, the OS that runs on the Z80 platform that is written in ASM. So, ASM would be simpler, technically.
Quote from: graphmastur on October 24, 2010, 01:09:39 pmQuote from: JosJuice on October 24, 2010, 01:57:49 amTI-BASIC would probably be simpler than Asm.No, because for BASIC, you would basically need the entire OS. In other words, the OS that runs on the Z80 platform that is written in ASM. So, ASM would be simpler, technically.Doesn't Asm require the OS too?
Quote from: JosJuice on October 24, 2010, 01:31:34 pmQuote from: graphmastur on October 24, 2010, 01:09:39 pmQuote from: JosJuice on October 24, 2010, 01:57:49 amTI-BASIC would probably be simpler than Asm.No, because for BASIC, you would basically need the entire OS. In other words, the OS that runs on the Z80 platform that is written in ASM. So, ASM would be simpler, technically.Doesn't Asm require the OS too?No, but you wouldn't be able to use any of the already built in routines the OS alread had.