Author Topic: MLC 3.0 (Read 12349 times)

kalan_vod · « **Reply #15 on:** May 14, 2006, 04:08:00 pm »

Well just so anyone who knows how to port, I am really interested in this!!! I would love for this to be ported to 83+

bfr · « **Reply #16 on:** May 19, 2006, 05:52:00 pm »

I suppose I could learn more about the TI-83+ and try to port it...the TI-86 and the TI-83+ both run on Z80 processors so assembly for them probably isn't too different.....

Also, I just noticed that I have a whole forum for my project. B)

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #17 on:** May 20, 2006, 02:30:00 am »

Yeah tenniskid created it I think ^^ we are starting having lot of projects o.o

the staff project section has like 25% of the whole forums posts to itself

kalan_vod · « **Reply #18 on:** May 20, 2006, 02:39:00 am »

It would be great if you could, and if you needed some help you could check out the forums at maxcoderz.org, revsoft.org, and unitedti.org as they have some great z80 coders.

bfr · « **Reply #19 on:** May 20, 2006, 02:54:00 pm »

I'll probably do that. I'm already registered at United TI and RevSoft, but I'll have to register at MaxCoderz.

This might be a bit off topic, but I found out a glitch in the MLC Sprite Editor for the TI-86 that allows the user to create a grayscale background for the calculator. It's pretty cool, and when I go to the graph screen, the background gets repeated and parts get truncated, and the current equations graphed get a duplicate in grayscale behind them. It messed up anything on my calculator that had to do with graphing and I had a quiz on graphing about twenty minutes after I figured this out at school. I had to reset my calculator, which had some useful math programs.

elfprince13 · « **Reply #20 on:** May 21, 2006, 02:53:00 pm »

perhaps we should concentrate on helping with a language like FastRPL or SLIDE which are designed specifically for 83+ series.

this would speed development and make it more likely to happen.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #21 on:** May 22, 2006, 01:58:00 am »

what is SLIDE?

elfprince13 · « **Reply #22 on:** May 22, 2006, 07:25:00 am »

look at DetachedSolutions SoC page.

bfr · « **Reply #23 on:** May 22, 2006, 11:41:00 am »

Good point. MLC could be kept for the TI-86 and Casio AFX (and any other calculator that could use an interpreted language...).

elfprince13 · « **Reply #24 on:** May 22, 2006, 01:01:00 pm »

my opinion is that if someone wants to write an MLC interpreter that is great, but there are already 2 other languages much closer to readiness on the 83+ series.

Ranman · « **Reply #25 on:** May 22, 2006, 01:15:00 pm »

I have always been really interested in this MLC.

This would really be a fun product to see finished. Maybe even include some Sharp and HP calcs into the mix.

This would definitely require extensive knowledge of the calculator's hardware and the appropriate assembly language, but very doable.

bfr · « **Reply #26 on:** May 22, 2006, 01:20:00 pm »

It would be nice to include some Sharp and HP calcs. The only calculator that I really know a lot about is the TI-86 though. I know some stuff about 68ks, but not enough to be a good 68k assembly programmer.

elfprince13 · « **Reply #27 on:** May 22, 2006, 02:13:00 pm »

oh well. I dont really care so long as somebody starts something.

way to many projects get stuck in planning and never finish.

Ranman · « **Reply #28 on:** May 22, 2006, 05:22:00 pm »

Does the source code exist for MLC -- both TI and Casio source code that is?

Who could we ask? Would they mind sharing it?

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #29 on:** May 23, 2006, 02:23:00 am »

http://dysfunction.earthforge.com/?p=mlc-release.php

EDIT: wow look at EPS forums they are spammed to death by spambots now o.o

Author Topic: MLC 3.0 (Read 12349 times)

elfprince13

elfprince13

elfprince13

elfprince13