0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Known manufacturer IDs are ID Manufacturer 01 AMD 04 Fujitsu 7F Unknown C2 UnknownKnown device IDs are ID Device 23 512 K (4 megabit) (old units) B9 512 K (4 megabit) (new units) C4 2048 K (16 megabit) DA 1024 K (8 megabit)Data ChartNote: VS = ViewScreenModel HW Bad LCD V# All RAM Port 15 Port 3A Chip ID Boot Owner84+SE S-0605D No 2 Yes 45 00 04C4 000000 Me84+SE S-0404 No 2 Yes 44 0F 04C4 000000 Runer11284+ S-0406F Yes 2 Yes 45 00 01DA 000000 Eeems84+SE P-0508M Yes 2 No 55 00 01C4 000000 thepenguin7784+SE P-0510O Yes 2 No 55 00 7FC4 000000 thepenguin7783+ S-0508K No 2 N/A 00 N/A 01B9 000045 Juju84+SE S-0606F No 2 Yes 45 00 01C4 000000 graphmastur84+ K-0207E No 2 Yes 45 00 C2DA 000000 ZippyDee84+SE S0306-F 10h 2 Yes 45 00 01C4 000000 BuckeyeDude84+SEVS S-1204A No 2 Yes 44 0F 04C4 000000 JosJuice84+SEVS S-0404 No 2 Yes 44 0F 04C4 000000 the_mad_joob83+VS I-0299A Yes 2 N/A 15 No 0123 010146 the_mad_joob
@Runer112 :Could you please tell if you have a viewscreen slot at the back of your model ?Because if yes, there's a chance port 3A would be related to this additionnal hardware piece.Nothing sure yet, since my 83+VS ouputs a "No" on that part of the test...Thx in advance =]
ZippyDee has a K. (I was hoping we could do some tests on those. (My opinion is those are "refurbished" calcs, i.e. calcs that were returned to TI as defective and then fixed and redistributed. I have no hard evidence to prove that, but it's my theory anyway. )