Oh, sorry, I forgot, I only used the "Never Gonna" parts.

nice meishe, I wonder how I didn't think of using for( to clear the RRoT part?

Oh, sorry, I forgot, I only used the "Never Gonna" parts.

nice meishe, I wonder how I didn't think of using for( to clear the RRoT part?

Thanks, though the only problem with using For( is that, one, it is technically slower and, two, it makes it more noticeable. Using the Output( command is faster and looks better, just quite a bit larger.

not sure if I cheated... but here is my solution.  Run ZZZZZ2 to start it, and it will auto go into ZZZZZ3, afterwards you can just run ZZZZZ3.

Spoiler For Spoiler:

Prgm ZZZZZ2

Code: [Select]

:ClrHome
:":→Str4
:"OMNIMAGA→Str1
:" *--++--* →Str2
:"THE             RICK    ROLLER'S        OF              TOMARROW→Str3
:{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,6→L1
:6→A
:‾1→B
:For(D,1,14
:For(C,1,8
:Str4+sub(sub(Str2,1,L1(C))+sub(Str1,L1(C),2)+sub(Str2,L1(C)+3,8-L1(C)),2,8)+sub(Str3,8(C-1)+1,8→Str4
:End
:A+B→A
:If A=7 or A=1
:‾B→B
:augment(DeltaList(cumSum(L1)),{A→L1
:Output(3,1,sub("[===============",1,D+1
:Output(3,16,"]
:End
:sub(Str4,2,1792→Str4
:prgmZZZZZ3
Prgm ZZZZZ3

Code: [Select]

:ClrHome
:0→A
:Ans→B
:While 1
:Output(1,1,sub(Str4,128A+1,128
:A+1→A
:If A=13
:0→A
:End

Could you please "un-spoil" the source codes? When you put [code][/code] inside of [spoiler][/spoiler] it compresses it very small and it is very hard to read. (At least it does in Chrome, I don't know about other browsers.)

That's a really interesting way of doing it. The only downside I see of doing it like this is, well one, that you have to do the first program each time if you change Str4 or something and, two, that since you're displaying parts of a string it slows down the farther into it and you can see where it restarts. Otherwise, very nice Only optimizations I see is that in the second program you can replace the 0→A and Ans→B with DelVar ADelVar B the second 0→A with DelVar A. Great job

Wow, that works really well (no flickers ). And fast! (Except the loading, but that doesn't matter much.)

EDIT: Sizes:

 ZZZZZ2     346 < Small...
  ZZZZZ3      65 < Wow, even smaller...
  Str4      1803 < ...

wierd, on my calc when I checked, str4 was ~2000 bytes... oh, that was before I restricted the size of the string... carry on   I tried to decide between fast, and small... fast won ^^