« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?  (Read 34940 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #45 on: November 18, 2010, 07:43:21 pm »
Quote from: ztrumpet on November 18, 2010, 01:02:09 pm
Quote from: Xeda112358 on November 17, 2010, 06:46:42 pm
Nice :D
Actually, are int( and iPart( only different for negative numbers? int( is the command I use for parser hooks (I have never released a program using the parser hook yet, but I make them every now and again for fun and for friends), so I was curious about how that might affect programmers if I ever did release one...
I've never used ipart(), for some reason I've always used int().
So, it would mess me up. ;D

Same here :D I guess it's actually easier to work with, since it's consistent no matter what number you put in.
Logged



Offline calc84maniac

  • eZ80 Guru
  • Coder Of Tomorrow
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2912
  • Rating: +471/-17
    • View Profile
    • TI-Boy CE
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #46 on: November 18, 2010, 07:51:51 pm »
int() is the floor function, which always rounds towards negative infinity. iPart() always rounds towards 0 (all digits after the decimal point are truncated, leaving the integer part intact even for negative numbers)
Logged
"Most people ask, 'What does a thing do?' Hackers ask, 'What can I make it do?'" - Pablos Holman

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #47 on: November 18, 2010, 07:52:35 pm »
Some info about iPart and Int differences: http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/ipart
Logged

Offline Builderboy

  • Physics Guru
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 5673
  • Rating: +613/-9
  • Would you kindly?
    • View Profile
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #48 on: November 18, 2010, 08:01:58 pm »
I use iPart most of the time, although it might be bad practice because i believe int() is faster for the most part XD
Logged

Offline squidgetx

  • Food.
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1881
  • Rating: +503/-17
  • rawr.
    • View Profile
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #49 on: November 18, 2010, 08:21:45 pm »
??? I actually heard the opposite (that iPart was faster), but then again I haven't coded BASIC for like two years so I could be wrong :P
Logged

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?
« Reply #50 on: November 18, 2010, 08:28:31 pm »
I always used iPart(, thinking it was faster as well.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »