Author Topic: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?  (Read 16470 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Galandros

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1140
  • Rating: +42/-10
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2009, 04:27:38 pm »
Using Tilp II

I adapted very well. But TI-Connect is easier to use and manage files (much nicer icons) but tilp is much faster.
I have still TI-connect in other computer to use sometimes.  :P

No doubt both the programs have their moods... I wonder if someone pulled tilp to overkill TI-Connect. ;D
Hobbing in calculator projects.

Offline JonimusPrime

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 389
  • Rating: +25/-5
    • View Profile
    • Jonimoose.net
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #31 on: January 08, 2009, 09:34:05 pm »
Really the issue is TILP has a better back end to it and the actual linking routines are well written but the front end or UI is poorly written and could use a lot of improvement. The opposite is true for TI-Connect, its UI is pretty but what it does behind the scenes will kill your calc.

"Always code as if the person who will maintain your code is a maniac serial killer that knows where you live" -Unknown

"If you've done something right no one will know that you've done anything at all" -Futurama

"Have a nice day, or not, the choice is yours." Tom Steiner

Offline Ti-newb

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 180
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #32 on: May 26, 2009, 10:10:40 pm »
I does not knows what you guys are talking about (* I do not know what you guys are talking about..)
TI-Connect always works for me, the only problem I had was when I didn't read instructions and I plugged the calculator into the computer without having the disk installed first... and it got all messed 0x5
« Last Edit: June 19, 2009, 12:10:44 am by Eeems »

Offline JonimusPrime

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 389
  • Rating: +25/-5
    • View Profile
    • Jonimoose.net
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #33 on: May 27, 2009, 07:16:33 am »
The way ti-cennect does its transfers will where out your flashchip faster than the method tilp uses, TILP also supports more types of home made cables like the parallel link which will never be supported in TI-Connect. Plus TILP is cross platform so you can use it on LINUX based systems as well as Windows.

"Always code as if the person who will maintain your code is a maniac serial killer that knows where you live" -Unknown

"If you've done something right no one will know that you've done anything at all" -Futurama

"Have a nice day, or not, the choice is yours." Tom Steiner

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #34 on: May 27, 2009, 03:30:27 pm »
Isn't TiLP much faster at transfering too? Again, I only ever tried with the old black serial TI-Graph Link cable, though, that came with my TI-83+SE in early 2002. In TI_Connect sometimes transfer would take about 10 seconds to even start at all, not to mention it caused the PC to hang completly until transfer actually began. When transfer began, it went at a quite good speed, tho. However with TiLP everything seemed twice faster and no loading time before transfering. TI-Graph Link gotta be the slowest of all, though, but back when I got my TI-83+ Silver Edition, TI-Connect and TiLP didn't even exist at all.

Offline skuller972

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 335
  • Rating: +11/-4
  • BEAST MODE
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #35 on: May 27, 2009, 04:31:26 pm »
I couldnt use TiLP, I tried but I didn't know how to do it right, and TI-Connect works fine for me and has more features. I couldn't figure out how to even get a file!! I also couldn't get a group to send. I guess TI-Connect works better for newer version calculators, because it never acted up unless I sent Joltima, and we all got together and solved that in last weeks puzzle challenge.
Then again, maybe not...
<a href="http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_nt2.php">
<img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/badge/nt2/bc7bf8e12353f09e.png" alt="NerdTests.com says I'm a Cool Non-Nerd.  Click here to take the Nerd Test, get nerdy images and jokes, and talk to others on the nerd forum!">
</a>

Offline Galandros

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1140
  • Rating: +42/-10
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #36 on: May 27, 2009, 04:35:20 pm »
I have the same impression tilp is faster...
But maybe the non-sense time starting of ti-connect makes this impression subjective...
Hobbing in calculator projects.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2009, 04:41:01 pm »
TiLP lack of user friendliness is indeed an issue. On top of that when I downloaded it the readme was out of date and misleading. It seemed they updated the software but left the readme for TiLP 1 or something. Took me a long while to figure out how to even send files

Offline Ti-newb

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 180
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #38 on: May 31, 2009, 10:36:26 am »
so wait.. using Ti-connect can wear out your FlashChip?  *Whats a Flash Chip? and whats it used for XD?

Offline Eeems

  • Mr. Dictator
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6268
  • Rating: +318/-36
  • little oof
    • View Profile
    • Eeems
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #39 on: May 31, 2009, 02:40:28 pm »
the flash chip is your flash memory, so the archive
/e

Offline Ti-newb

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 180
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #40 on: June 01, 2009, 08:37:15 pm »
I see. but it wouldn't be possible to run purely on ram would it? cause im guessing the TI-OS in archive..

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #41 on: June 01, 2009, 11:40:14 pm »
I think the flash memory can be overwritten 200000 times or so

after about 20 years, a calc used to program extensively would prbly stop working or something, but I'm unsure how. I do know Casio AFX  calcs lasts a few years because they also use flash memory. I am unsure how stuff is stored in it, though

Offline Ti-newb

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 180
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #42 on: June 02, 2009, 10:44:29 pm »
okay. good. Cause i was thinking if i kept porting stuff into my Ti-84 i would have to get a replacement soon.. but in 20 years lol.. id prolly have to get another one anyways.(cause the Ti-84 would b so outdated)

Offline simplethinker

  • LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
  • *******
  • Posts: 695
  • Rating: +16/-5
  • snjwffl
    • View Profile
Re: Is TI-Connect really THAT Bad?
« Reply #43 on: June 08, 2009, 05:20:11 pm »
To change data in ROM (the flash archive on the TI calculators), it first must be cleared, which is accomplished by applying a large voltage to a part of the chip to set/reset some connectors/links.  Then, another high voltage is applied to the necessary "links" to set them.  You can probably figure out how it can get worn out.  But that takes a ton of writes, and you probably won't get to the limit where damage occurs during the lifetime of your calculator.

I see. but it wouldn't be possible to run purely on ram would it? cause im guessing the TI-OS in archive..
The ROM page that the TI-OS is on rarely gets modified, so you shouldn't need to worry about the OS getting 'worn out'.
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true." -- Professor Robert Silensky



Chip's Challenge: ħ%