0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Wow, now that I'm learing ASM, this helps me a lot more. I was concerened about not being able to access a comp enough to write ASM programs.
Quote from: FloppusMaximus on October 14, 2010, 11:13:15 pmTo get back on topic, I've found a rather serious bug in Mimas's symbol hashing, which can sometimes cause the assembler to crash. This might also have caused occasional misassemblies and inappropriate "symbol redefined" errors. So, there'll be another bugfix release shortly.And back to the subject of on-calc app signing, since you guys have gotten me thinking about that again... after some experimentation and back-of-the-envelope calculations, I'll wager that you can do a lot better than 13 minutes. Like, under a minute. Also, I wasn't correct when I said that Rabin is necessarily much faster than RSA; I think you could apply similar tricks and speed up RSA by a similar amount, if you cared to do so.^ Maybe it's that?And did the emulated calc freeze or did Wabbit completely freeze up? If it's only the calc, then that happens a lot (I do infinite loops all the time ) and you can just go to Debug > Reset.If it's Wabbit, though... I've had that happen too. It was an early bug, but it should be fixed in the current version (at http://wabbit.codeplex.com/).
To get back on topic, I've found a rather serious bug in Mimas's symbol hashing, which can sometimes cause the assembler to crash. This might also have caused occasional misassemblies and inappropriate "symbol redefined" errors. So, there'll be another bugfix release shortly.And back to the subject of on-calc app signing, since you guys have gotten me thinking about that again... after some experimentation and back-of-the-envelope calculations, I'll wager that you can do a lot better than 13 minutes. Like, under a minute. Also, I wasn't correct when I said that Rabin is necessarily much faster than RSA; I think you could apply similar tricks and speed up RSA by a similar amount, if you cared to do so.
Quote from: Deep Thought on November 12, 2010, 12:38:22 pmQuote from: FloppusMaximus on October 14, 2010, 11:13:15 pmTo get back on topic, I've found a rather serious bug in Mimas's symbol hashing, which can sometimes cause the assembler to crash. This might also have caused occasional misassemblies and inappropriate "symbol redefined" errors. So, there'll be another bugfix release shortly.And back to the subject of on-calc app signing, since you guys have gotten me thinking about that again... after some experimentation and back-of-the-envelope calculations, I'll wager that you can do a lot better than 13 minutes. Like, under a minute. Also, I wasn't correct when I said that Rabin is necessarily much faster than RSA; I think you could apply similar tricks and speed up RSA by a similar amount, if you cared to do so.^ Maybe it's that?And did the emulated calc freeze or did Wabbit completely freeze up? If it's only the calc, then that happens a lot (I do infinite loops all the time ) and you can just go to Debug > Reset.If it's Wabbit, though... I've had that happen too. It was an early bug, but it should be fixed in the current version (at http://wabbit.codeplex.com/).Wabbit completely froze and I had to shut it down through the task manager. I don't think it was an infinite loop, because all I was doing was passing stuff to the processor to see how certain values are returned. No looping whatsoever. It wasn't my code per se, but it *should* work, being as the code was written for the processor.
Bloody good way to **** up your calculator.
Good advice. Luckily, TI actually did something right and wrote a BCALL for it into the OS. I only found out about it afterwards. The downside is that the bad routine appears to be several dozen times more efficient.
EXXBIT 7,BEXXJP NZ,SUB1