Author Topic: oops... (Read 8681 times)

calc84maniac · « **Reply #15 on:** September 11, 2007, 07:17:00 pm »

Eh, it was just a lack of proper documentation and a bit of stupidity on my part that did it.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #16 on:** September 11, 2007, 07:57:00 pm »

and now cemetech also got hit by deletion

nitacku · « **Reply #17 on:** September 11, 2007, 11:15:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-calc84maniac+11 Sep, 2007, 19:48-->

QUOTE (calc84maniac @ 11 Sep, 2007, 19:48)

I lost:
Project M (restored the binary, though)
Latest version of OTBP Assembler (gives me an excuse to rewrite it)
My interrupt-based sound routine (not too hard to remake, I guess)
The small progress with GSM2
Most of the SMB2 sprites I made over the past couple of weeks
Xtravar Beta 2 source code (salvaged the binary, that's all I need I guess)
...anything else on that calc, pretty much.

XtraVar Beta 2!

I use XtraVar all the time! It helps prevent archive errors and overwrite errors, not to mention that the user can't edit the variables to cheat.

How is the new version going to differ from the original (or is this secret

)

calc84maniac · « **Reply #18 on:** September 12, 2007, 03:54:00 am »

It looks a little different and it's smaller.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #19 on:** September 12, 2007, 04:03:00 am »

what is XtraVar O_O

?

calc84maniac · « **Reply #20 on:** September 12, 2007, 04:05:00 am »

http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/391/39138.html

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #21 on:** September 12, 2007, 04:08:00 am »

ooh nice program! good job on it

dinhotheone · « **Reply #22 on:** September 12, 2007, 12:23:00 pm »

i have a question, i dont know alot about assembly but it seems like it'd be tough to code on calc. how do you do the actual coding if the commands are different from basic?

TIfanx1999 · « **Reply #23 on:** September 12, 2007, 01:38:00 pm »

You'd have to use an on calc assembler that some one made.

dinhotheone · « **Reply #24 on:** September 12, 2007, 02:28:00 pm »

it seems like the assembler just assembles what is already written, i was wondering how you write the stuff in asm. like i know the commands look way different

kalan_vod · « **Reply #25 on:** September 12, 2007, 04:23:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-dinhotheone+12 Sep, 2007, 20:28-->

QUOTE (dinhotheone @ 12 Sep, 2007, 20:28)

it seems like the assembler just assembles what is already written, i was wondering how you write the stuff in asm. like i know the commands look way different

Check out http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/403/40304.html, but if you need to know how to code in asm then you need to read some tutorials.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #26 on:** September 12, 2007, 05:50:00 pm »

There was an asm compiler on calc called MON in think, back in 2003, it was like OTBP asembler but less user friendly and very very slow (except for compiling)

kalan_vod · « **Reply #27 on:** September 13, 2007, 03:47:00 am »

I remember a app called Charsm or something..

dinhotheone · « **Reply #28 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:28:00 am »

okay i get it now. i had thought that the program merely assembles a higher level language (asm) into an executable hex code or something. but it seems that your saying the otbp assembler holds an entire IDE (is that the word) so you can actually code on calc.

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #29 on:** September 13, 2007, 12:12:00 pm »

kalan: yeah, but the one i am talking about was written in BASIC' like OTBP assembler (altough this one use some asm libs). Chasm was entirely asm though, but too bad it died