Author Topic: Prizm vs 89TI  (Read 8343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeong

  • Not a bridge
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3739
  • Rating: +278/-12
  • Survivor of Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2011, 08:16:21 am »
ah. :D
also, wasn't there something about different version of CAS stuff?
Sig wipe!

Offline Eiyeron

  • Urist McEiyolobster
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1430
  • Rating: +130/-10
  • (-_(//));
    • View Profile
    • Rétro-Actif : Rétro/Prog/Blog
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #16 on: November 26, 2011, 10:28:53 am »
If the Prizm'll get an F-Zero, Prizm > 89...

Offline Lionel Debroux

  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2135
  • Rating: +290/-45
    • View Profile
    • TI-Chess Team
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #17 on: November 26, 2011, 10:47:19 am »
Given the more powerful processor, a F-Zero would be easier to make on the Prizm than it is on the TI-68k family...
Member of the TI-Chess Team.
Co-maintainer of GCC4TI (GCC4TI online documentation), TILP and TIEmu.
Co-admin of TI-Planet.

Offline Stefan Bauwens

  • Creator of Myst 89 - סטיבן
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1799
  • Rating: +162/-24
  • 68k programmer
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #18 on: November 26, 2011, 01:22:25 pm »
So have you decided yet?
Because actually I think you would be happy with both, just that they're both different in different ways. Ofcourse if CAS is REALLY important you better go for the 89 first(and eventually buy a prizm later?)


Very proud Ticalc.org POTY winner (2011 68k) with Myst 89!
Very proud TI-Planet.org DBZ winner(2013)

Interview with me

Offline mrmprog

  • LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
  • *******
  • Posts: 559
  • Rating: +35/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #19 on: November 26, 2011, 01:26:28 pm »
Thanks for all the info guys. I think that the 89 is better for the coding I want to do, but the prizm seems really fun. Is there a chance that drawing commands will be faster in a later update? Also, how much can I get a prizm for? I saw one at walmart for only $97.99 a while back.

Offline Stefan Bauwens

  • Creator of Myst 89 - סטיבן
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1799
  • Rating: +162/-24
  • 68k programmer
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #20 on: November 26, 2011, 02:52:07 pm »
I guess, but I'm not certain, that maybe some people could make something like another programming language for the Prizm to use oncalc where drawing commands normally would go faster.
Right now, I don't really know. Also I'm not good at those prices. I bought all my calcs second hand. My second 89(non titanium) I only bough for 26 euro(sending included) and it was in perfect quality. Best deal ever. ;)


Very proud Ticalc.org POTY winner (2011 68k) with Myst 89!
Very proud TI-Planet.org DBZ winner(2013)

Interview with me

Offline apcalc

  • The Game
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1393
  • Rating: +120/-2
  • VGhlIEdhbWUh (Base 64 :))
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #21 on: November 26, 2011, 04:40:30 pm »
Just a quick comment, if you want a color screen and a CAS, the Nspire CX is not that bad.  It is very limited in programming, which is a major drawback, but it does provide both of the above options! :)

I would recommend an 89 personally! ;)


Offline TIfanx1999

  • ಠ_ಠ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 6173
  • Rating: +191/-9
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #22 on: November 26, 2011, 08:41:48 pm »
Not sure what the current price is. When I bought mine I *think* it was a bit cheaper than an 84+ SE. $97 sounds pretty cheap (similarly priced to a TI-83+ where I live).

Offline BalancedFury

  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • ********
  • Posts: 722
  • Rating: +29/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #23 on: November 27, 2011, 06:26:14 pm »
Prizm... HAZ... KOLOR!!! >:D
Antonio Nam = DualBLDR = Tony Arthur... U choose!





JOIN THE PETITION TO ADD THIS EMOTICON!!
[|:{P ------->


Yo dawg I herd u lost the game game so I coded the game game in your calc so you can lose the game game while you code your code about losing the game game.

Offline mrmprog

  • LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
  • *******
  • Posts: 559
  • Rating: +35/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #24 on: November 27, 2011, 07:15:27 pm »
Prizm... HAZ... KOLOR!!! >:D
Exactly how I feel. I think the 89 is a better choice, but:
1) I have never owned a casio calc
2) This is a new platform
3) Other languages (than basic)
4) COLOR!

Offline Stefan Bauwens

  • Creator of Myst 89 - סטיבן
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1799
  • Rating: +162/-24
  • 68k programmer
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2011, 02:57:17 am »
Prizm... HAZ... KOLOR!!! >:D
Exactly how I feel. I think the 89 is a better choice, but:
1) I have never owned a casio calc
2) This is a new platform
3) Other languages (than basic)
4) COLOR!

Other languages than basic? If you mean C, you can have that on the 89 too ;) (and newprog aswell, which is for on calc use).
Can't you lend one of a friend or something to try it out for a few days(or a 89)?


Very proud Ticalc.org POTY winner (2011 68k) with Myst 89!
Very proud TI-Planet.org DBZ winner(2013)

Interview with me

Offline Jim Bauwens

  • Lua! Nspire! Linux!
  • Editor
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1881
  • Rating: +206/-7
  • Linux!
    • View Profile
    • nothing...
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #26 on: November 28, 2011, 03:08:11 am »
Just to note, don't forget pure assembly ;)
Without the ability to run native programs, you could never have C (which is native).

So in theory, it would be possible to have a whole range of other Languages on the Prizm and the TI-89.
Someone just need to make a compiler for them :)

Offline DrDnar

  • LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
  • *******
  • Posts: 546
  • Rating: +97/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #27 on: November 28, 2011, 03:26:40 am »
The TI-89T is a more eco-friendly device precisely because it doesn't have a color screen. It will get much better battery life than anything with a color screen can get. The only graphing calculator that can beat the TI-89T in the battery life category is the TI-84+/SE (which gets about double the battery life).
"No tools will make a man a skilled workman, or master of defense, nor be of any use to him who has not learned how to handle them, and has never bestowed any attention upon them. . . . Yes, [] the tools which would teach men their own use would be beyond price."—Plato's The Republic, circa 380 BC

Offline JosJuice

  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1344
  • Rating: +66/-14
    • View Profile
Re: Prizm vs 89TI
« Reply #28 on: November 28, 2011, 10:39:01 am »
The TI-89T is a more eco-friendly device precisely because it doesn't have a color screen. It will get much better battery life than anything with a color screen can get. The only graphing calculator that can beat the TI-89T in the battery life category is the TI-84+/SE (which gets about double the battery life).
My Prizm seems to have a battery life that's at least as good as my TI-84+SE (at least when both use NiMH batteries, but even the non-rechargeable batteries that were included with the Prizm seemed to last a few months of active use). I haven't compared it with an 89T, however.