0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I briefly mentioned it on IRC, I believe.Quote from: graphmastur on October 19, 2010, 10:07:25 pmMaybe that's what I should have done. Pretended you already told me about it, then figure it out. Or, I could just do like I did with KOS, and bother you till you tell me. 0.o lol, jk.Wow, that would work well if you hadn't already PMed me asking what it is And you are quite a bother about KOS
Maybe that's what I should have done. Pretended you already told me about it, then figure it out. Or, I could just do like I did with KOS, and bother you till you tell me. 0.o lol, jk.
You have a project? I mean, yeah, it's awesome! j/k
I'll think about it so far I've only been able to extract you-know-what from you-know-whats and enumerate the you-know-whats
Sounds good Btw, when do I get to start developing for KOS
and get TIDE working.
Quote from: _player1537 on October 19, 2010, 10:15:16 pmSounds good Btw, when do I get to start developing for KOS Ahhh! Stop bothering me about this, guys I don't have a lot of spare time. Think of it this way - the longer it takes for you to get it, the more polished it will be.Quote from: graphmastur on October 19, 2010, 10:15:18 pmand get TIDE working.*TI DevelopertiDE is not very far along, I haven't even finished the assembler, or the emulator (the GUI is pretty nice, though)
Quote from: SirCmpwn on October 19, 2010, 10:18:20 pmQuote from: _player1537 on October 19, 2010, 10:15:16 pmSounds good Btw, when do I get to start developing for KOS Ahhh! Stop bothering me about this, guys I don't have a lot of spare time. Think of it this way - the longer it takes for you to get it, the more polished it will be.Quote from: graphmastur on October 19, 2010, 10:15:18 pmand get TIDE working.*TI DevelopertiDE is not very far along, I haven't even finished the assembler, or the emulator (the GUI is pretty nice, though)oh, good point. oh. Yeah, TIDeveloper needs an acronym. Anyway, I know how stressful it is to get everything done, but we are all in it with you. We keep you motivated to strive to do your best and keep at it deep into the knight. Pun very much so intended.
you mean antidisassemblage. the compiler and IDE is called squirrelbox. it's kinda cool, but pretty simple because the guy who started making it lost interest methinks.I'm pretty sure antidisassemblage is an attempt to make assembly more simular to C or C++, and It is pretty complete if you wanna download it on ticalc (look for squirrelbox in PC utilities methinks)EDIT: ps it's also only on PC, not on-calc
Quote from: ASHBAD_ALVIN on October 19, 2010, 09:55:35 pmyou mean antidisassemblage. the compiler and IDE is called squirrelbox. it's kinda cool, but pretty simple because the guy who started making it lost interest methinks.I'm pretty sure antidisassemblage is an attempt to make assembly more simular to C or C++, and It is pretty complete if you wanna download it on ticalc (look for squirrelbox in PC utilities methinks)EDIT: ps it's also only on PC, not on-calcIt was not really finished, even thought it got version 1.0 status. Apparently a lot of code won't compile. It's also kinda hard from what I saw. You need ASM knowledge to learn it, defeating its purpose.Btw xLIB, Omnicalc, DCSlib, Celtic III and the like are more like extensions to TI-BASIC rather than new language. Same thing for EZAsm and TI-Power Gold with z80 assembly.The current languages available for the 83+/84+ besides extensions are TI-BASIC, ASM, Axe, BBC Basic, Fast RPL and Antidisassemblage. BBC Basic is quite good but the on-calc editor is not so user-friendly (which is why the language is not as popular as Axe)As for what Sir is talking about I don,t remember. X.x. I personally prefer Axe because it's easy to learn when you know TI-BASIC. I also like TI-BASIC except for two things: the slow speed and the size of data. I like the small executable code size and the lack of a executable code limit in BASIC, though.