Author Topic: Project DreamCalc Revived  (Read 11563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Spyro543

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1189
  • Rating: +74/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2011, 05:39:01 pm »
Making a clamshell design lets me make a bigger screen and keyboard and have it still fit in the pocket. :)

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #16 on: August 23, 2011, 06:11:35 pm »
Yeah, the 92's shape was great, but too big. It would have been perfect if it had been just the qwerty area, without the sidebar, and a little smaller screen.

A clamshell would be pretty sweet. Maybe you could see if you could buy openPandora cases, and use those! That would be the perfect shape and size, then throw in your own board.

Offline runeazn

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Rating: +5/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #17 on: August 23, 2011, 06:18:47 pm »
yeah add a qwerty keyboard as the custom calculator isnt allowed for any exams anyway :P

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #18 on: August 23, 2011, 06:49:31 pm »
Actually it would be allowed on exams as long as it fulfilled their requirements. The ACT's, at least, is an exclusion-based list, not an inclusion-based one, meaning that while it does list examples that are allowed, it has general requirements that you can apply to any calculator to determine whether it's allowed.

The only requirements:
Non-CAS
It can't be marketed as a PDA or computer, so no laptops or tablets.
No communication Devices, i.e. cell phones, and no bluetooth/Wifi.

Sound must be able to be turned off if present.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #19 on: August 23, 2011, 07:03:27 pm »
Yeah true, it just must not have a keyboard like qwerty, azerty, etc. It should be ABCDEF

Offline runeazn

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Rating: +5/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2011, 07:05:10 pm »
Actually it would be allowed on exams as long as it fulfilled their requirements. The ACT's, at least, is an exclusion-based list, not an inclusion-based one, meaning that while it does list examples that are allowed, it has general requirements that you can apply to any calculator to determine whether it's allowed.

The only requirements:
Non-CAS
It can't be marketed as a PDA or computer, so no laptops or tablets.
No communication Devices, i.e. cell phones, and no bluetooth/Wifi.

Sound must be able to be turned off if present.

oh well we in holland use a inclusion list so only those listed devices are allowed, seems rules differ in a other part of the world :)

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #21 on: August 23, 2011, 07:09:39 pm »
Well, I suppose licensing it to those committees that do require it would be essential for the calculator to be popular in those areas.

Offline yunhua98

  • You won't this read sentence right.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2718
  • Rating: +214/-12
  • Go take a dive in the River Lethe.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2011, 09:07:47 pm »
I vote clamshell. ;)

EDIT:  like this: but longer, more like a square.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2011, 09:10:24 pm by yunhua98 »

Spoiler For =====My Projects=====:
Minor setback due to code messing up.  On hold for Contest.
<hr>
On hold for Contest.


Spoiler For ===Staff Memberships===:






Have you seen any good news-worthy programs/events?  If so, PM me with an article to be included in the next issue of CGPN!
The Game is only a demo, the code that allows one to win hasn't been done.
To paraphrase Oedipus, Hamlet, Lear, and all those guys, "I wish I had known this some time ago."
Signature Last Updated: 12/26/11
<hr>

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2011, 11:33:59 pm »
Also, the Dpad must be located on a top corner.

Better yet: Two D-Pads! one on each corner! The excuse could be that one is the arithmetic functions! Games would be so much more epic with that! :P

Offline JosJuice

  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1344
  • Rating: +66/-14
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #24 on: August 24, 2011, 10:10:38 am »
The requirements for tests are probably more strict that what they want to tell you. If you look at their restrictions (CAS, wireless communication, things that make noise, etc.), those things have been implemented in some calculators. They don't list restrictions that don't apply to any existing calcs since the average user doesn't need to do that. For example, the things that are now called animated flipbooks on the Prizm were originally going to be called movies, but that was apparently not allowed, so Casio had to change it. Making a calc without knowing all of the hidden requirements might be very hard if you want it to be accepted at tests.

Offline runeazn

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Rating: +5/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #25 on: August 24, 2011, 04:54:01 pm »
I don't know if you will be able to fit the board in a clamshell very well,
worth the try though,
I would gone the standard look, the 84+/nspire etc.

Offline Spyro543

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1189
  • Rating: +74/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #26 on: August 24, 2011, 04:56:41 pm »
What I would have problems with is getting wires through the hinge.

Offline runeazn

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Rating: +5/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #27 on: August 24, 2011, 04:58:11 pm »
exactly

the screen caable is very wide...
« Last Edit: August 24, 2011, 04:58:30 pm by runeazn »

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #28 on: August 24, 2011, 10:56:25 pm »
not if you section it and bind the sections together. You can get a 2.5 inch ribbon cable down to a 1/4 inch dia. cable that way. I've seen it inside the gateway profile computers, so they can fit their IDE cables all over the place.

Offline Spyro543

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1189
  • Rating: +74/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Project DreamCalc Revived
« Reply #29 on: August 26, 2011, 06:33:50 am »
Still wondering what screen I should use...