0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It seems that one good thing TI did was to make the calcs durable.
Quote from: MRide on July 24, 2010, 12:59:35 pmIt seems that one good thing TI did was to make the calcs durable.So true, except of course the TI-80 (Lot of people at school had those and when they felt on the floor, it didn't take much for the screen to break)
Yeah it was one of the worst, except in terms of RAM, it would be the 81. But yeah even the LCD is worse on the 80. So hard to see even at lv 9 contrast. It was replaced by the 73
yep. which tells you the programming part of the company sucks, and the manufacturing part is great.
Yeah, the TI-80 was awful. It used the small font always (the screen was only 48*64, half the size of that on other calcs), so certain symbols, like *, took up more space than other characters. It also used a non-z80 processor. (Did we ever find out what processor it was, exactly?)And nice on the RPG, DJ. I don't think I've said that yet