0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
The 1.19 fix is on the way. I've been having some troubles, (I killed about 20 wabbitemus.) But it's coming. It would have been done if it weren't for the fact that the flash paging ports of the 83+ don't AND the value of a flash page that doesn't exist. For instance, on the 84+ BE if you tell it to go to page $7D, it really goes to $7D & $3F = $3D. But on the 83+, if you tell it to go to $7D, it goes to like $02, which will not work.
TIA.
hmm, my TI-84+ with OS 1.15 (yes, I used one of Brandon's programs to do so..) had the err: versionbut I went to 1.19 and it was all better
But here it is. This will fix that 1/16384 chance that your program won't open.
Quote from: ztrumpet on September 25, 2010, 09:47:26 amTIA. Here, do you mean "thanks in advance" or "tits in action"?
Another thing I wonder is if it's possible to fix the bug mentionned in http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/text in an OS patch?
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on September 25, 2010, 05:16:46 pmAnother thing I wonder is if it's possible to fix the bug mentionned in http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/text in an OS patch?See this topic for more info: http://ourl.ca/4059
Quote from: qazz42 on September 25, 2010, 09:59:46 amhmm, my TI-84+ with OS 1.15 (yes, I used one of Brandon's programs to do so..) had the err: versionbut I went to 1.19 and it was all betterI got ERR:VERSION on 1.18 personally, when grouping stuff, but MUCH less often than with OS 1.12 through 1.14. I never ever tried OS 1.15 through 1.17. I don't know if I ever got a version error on OS 1.19
\damnit, on another note, it seems that a TI-83+ OS does not like being in a TI-84+SE
damnit, on another note, it seems that a TI-83+ OS does not like being in a TI-84+SE
And anyway, is the 1.19 fix for the ERR:BAD ADDRESS bug?