Author Topic: TI-84 Plus OS  (Read 30687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Netham45

  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2103
  • Rating: +213/-4
  • *explodes*
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2010, 04:40:42 am »
2.21 and 2.22 are far from stable. You shouldn't use them, ever. They have sequence graphing bugs (patched with http://brandonw.net/calcstuff/seqfix.zip if memory serves).


Is that why they redid the graphing in 2.30 and onwards?
Omnimaga Admin

Offline critor

  • Editor
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2079
  • Rating: +439/-13
    • View Profile
    • TI-Planet
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2010, 04:46:39 am »
Wait, what? TI still has it on their website? I knew it was available from Web Archive, but I would have thought they would have gotten rid of it elsewhere.

I'm going to download it now, so if/when I get an 84+ I don't need to resort to other means if TI has gotten rid of it by then.

EDIT: What was OS 0.46? Was it the one that had experimental printing capabilities?

It's not written on Brandon's web page, but the printing tests from OS 0.46 were also included from the beginning in OSes 2.21 and 2.22.
They've been removed in OS 2.30.


I have it now, and I applied the patches also  :D
Now I won't have to worry about ERR:VERSION!  :)

What patch ?
TI-Planet co-admin.

Offline coolsnake

  • LV2 Member (Next: 40)
  • **
  • Posts: 36
  • Rating: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2010, 06:56:18 am »
Hm, can anyone give more details about the "sequence graphing bug"?
I'll admit that I hardly ever graphed sequence equations before.
I just tried it and didn't notice anything special even when tracing it which seems that the problem was from in the readme.

That being said, I still won't upgrade from OS 2.22. I don't exactly know what is meant with unstable. Does it mean random RAM clears? If so, I really didn't notice unless I used buggy programs.

Really now, why should I trade in my fast graphing speed for an USB activity hook, TI peripheral support, PTT, some new features (which I don't use) and mathprint.
The first three are utterly useless to someone who uses his graphing calculator for what it is, a graphing calculator.

There are only three reasons I can think of for why you should upgrade as a "casual user":


-Noteworthy "new" features from http://wikiti.brandonw.net/index.php?title=83Plus:OS:VersionDifferences
#  "manual-line fit"
# improved graphing of functions with discontinuities when Xres=1 (the reason of the graphing slowdown)
# new statistics features:

    * chi-square goodness of fit test
    * confidence interval for slope
    * inverse student T
(excluding features from OS 2.53)


-Stability
I'll admit that it's certainly possible that OS 2.21/2.21 is more unstable than I make it seem. To be honest I really don't have any problems with it.
Maybe there is stuff that's just buggy to use but if it is, I didn't use it up until this point. Simple as that.


-OS 2.53
http://wikiti.brandonw.net/index.php?title=83Plus:OS:OS_2.53MP_Changes
This is by far the most visible change that TI has done. You hate it or love it.
I loved the way that you can have a visual representation of the function "fnint(" for one.
I hated the nagscreen after every ram clear and the extreme slowdown when using mathprint.
This was the change I actually considered. Until I wrote a program that does exactly the same thing as mathprint does with fnint(.
Unpretty Integrals
This program gives you a graphical representation of the "fnint(" function, which allows you to calculate definite integrals. It is extremely similar to the functionality MathPrint provides, minus the extreme bloat that slows your calculator down to a crawl.

Offline qazz42

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1130
  • Rating: +30/-12
  • hiiiiiiiii
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #18 on: September 11, 2010, 07:21:47 am »
D: you use a graphing calculator for math?!

that's unpossible!

Online DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #19 on: September 11, 2010, 02:32:51 pm »
Personally I upgrade to the latest version when possible, but in the 84+ case, I would not go further than 2.43, the latest most stable OS. I do not like MP very much and due to bad experiences I had with early OSes for a new calc, I would be scared of using OS 2.21 or the like on the 84+. When the 83+SE came out, I had OS 1.13 on it and it was by far the most unstable TI-OS I ever used. (e.g: RAM Clears when scrolling the PRGM list from the BASIC editor when you have over 50 or so). However it is your choice to not upgrade. If you never use your graphing calc to program or make games, it may not matter much to you as much as for us, calc game programmers.

Offline Michael_Lee

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1019
  • Rating: +124/-9
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #20 on: September 11, 2010, 07:22:41 pm »
I have 2.53 MP, and I'd like to mention that I haven't really experienced any slowdown, probably because I run mostly only my programs, which aren't usually reliant on speed for effective gameplay.  Could anybody provide an example of a game that runs noticeably slower on 2.53 MP?

Besides, doesn't it act like the older versions if you change it to classic mode (goes faster, e.g.)?

The nag-screen is pretty annoying, though. 
My website: Currently boring.

Projects:
Axe Interpreter
   > Core: Done
   > Memory: Need write code to add constants.
   > Graphics: Rewritten.  Needs to integrate sprites with constants.
   > IO: GetKey done.  Need to add mostly homescreen IO stuff.
Croquette:
   > Stomping bugs
   > Internet version: On hold until I can make my website less boring/broken.

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2010, 07:23:42 pm »
Mostly it's the homescreen that got slowed down, since the OS has to update whatever you type in into its "mathprint". Also, is seems to crash randomly after I type certain sequences of tokens (in other words, instead of the classic ERR:SYNTAX, some combos (I don't remember which) just caused a RAM clear x.x).
« Last Edit: September 11, 2010, 07:57:59 pm by Deep Thought »




Online DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2010, 10:59:06 pm »
I have 2.53 MP, and I'd like to mention that I haven't really experienced any slowdown, probably because I run mostly only my programs, which aren't usually reliant on speed for effective gameplay.  Could anybody provide an example of a game that runs noticeably slower on 2.53 MP?
Illusiat 13 or anything else that runs on the home screen. Make sure that MATHPRINT is enabled, not CLASSIC.

There are even games that won't display properly under 2.53/4 MP. Also, all xLIB games won't run on 2.53 MP unless you install BrandonW's patch (which doesn't fix the home screen issues), although now xLIB is obsoleted by Doors CS anyway.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2010, 11:01:23 pm by DJ Omnimaga »

Offline coolsnake

  • LV2 Member (Next: 40)
  • **
  • Posts: 36
  • Rating: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2010, 06:42:34 am »
I have 2.53 MP, and I'd like to mention that I haven't really experienced any slowdown, probably because I run mostly only my programs, which aren't usually reliant on speed for effective gameplay.  Could anybody provide an example of a game that runs noticeably slower on 2.53 MP?

Besides, doesn't it act like the older versions if you change it to classic mode (goes faster, e.g.)?

The nag-screen is pretty annoying, though. 

Try going to the equations screen (Y=) with mathprint enabled.
I don't think that the ability to turn it off salvages it. From what I remember the shortcut menus are generally unusable when mathprint is disabled. The shortcut menus are pretty much the only reason why I'd upgrade to OS 2.53 in the first place. It seems to add unneeded complexity when you need to press a switch before you can go from a shortcutmenu to the equations screen. The fact that the ability to enable/disable mathprint is hidden deep in the mode screen doesn't help either.
Unpretty Integrals
This program gives you a graphical representation of the "fnint(" function, which allows you to calculate definite integrals. It is extremely similar to the functionality MathPrint provides, minus the extreme bloat that slows your calculator down to a crawl.

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2010, 11:14:55 am »
And they added stuff like summation, but you could get there with sum(seq( anyway. I'd still use 0.43. It's stable enough.




Online DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #25 on: September 12, 2010, 12:34:51 pm »
I have 2.53 MP, and I'd like to mention that I haven't really experienced any slowdown, probably because I run mostly only my programs, which aren't usually reliant on speed for effective gameplay.  Could anybody provide an example of a game that runs noticeably slower on 2.53 MP?

Besides, doesn't it act like the older versions if you change it to classic mode (goes faster, e.g.)?

The nag-screen is pretty annoying, though. 

Try going to the equations screen (Y=) with mathprint enabled.
I don't think that the ability to turn it off salvages it. From what I remember the shortcut menus are generally unusable when mathprint is disabled. The shortcut menus are pretty much the only reason why I'd upgrade to OS 2.53 in the first place. It seems to add unneeded complexity when you need to press a switch before you can go from a shortcutmenu to the equations screen. The fact that the ability to enable/disable mathprint is hidden deep in the mode screen doesn't help either.
I notice no slow down when mathprint is disabled, personally, but with Mathprint ON it is terrible. Also I heard there were bugs in the OS anyway so unless you absolutely need it, I really recommend sticking to another OS (preferably 2.43, or if you absolutely need faster graphing, 2.21 or something)

Offline qazz42

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1130
  • Rating: +30/-12
  • hiiiiiiiii
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #26 on: September 12, 2010, 12:39:28 pm »
Yeah, I personally would never use anything but 2.43

also, cant you just download the pretty-print app?

Offline calcdude84se

  • Needs Motivation
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2272
  • Rating: +78/-13
  • Wondering where their free time went...
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #27 on: September 12, 2010, 12:51:34 pm »
The only advantage to "MathPrint" is that it's editable in real time and in said form. With PrettyPrint you have to edit linearly and can't evaluate the expressions.
Not that that's very important :P PrettyPrint also has copy/paste abilities ;D
"People think computers will keep them from making mistakes. They're wrong. With computers you make mistakes faster."
-Adam Osborne
Spoiler For "PartesOS links":
I'll put it online when it does something.

Offline Michael_Lee

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1019
  • Rating: +124/-9
    • View Profile
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #28 on: September 12, 2010, 02:13:50 pm »
Illusiat 13 or anything else that runs on the home screen. Make sure that MATHPRINT is enabled, not CLASSIC.

There are even games that won't display properly under 2.53/4 MP. Also, all xLIB games won't run on 2.53 MP unless you install BrandonW's patch (which doesn't fix the home screen issues), although now xLIB is obsoleted by Doors CS anyway.

Ah, thanks.  xLIB doesn't work?  That sucks.

Try going to the equations screen (Y=) with mathprint enabled.
I don't think that the ability to turn it off salvages it. From what I remember the shortcut menus are generally unusable when mathprint is disabled. The shortcut menus are pretty much the only reason why I'd upgrade to OS 2.53 in the first place. It seems to add unneeded complexity when you need to press a switch before you can go from a shortcutmenu to the equations screen. The fact that the ability to enable/disable mathprint is hidden deep in the mode screen doesn't help either.

By shortcut menus, do you mean the F1, F2 things?  (Alpha, then one of the top menu buttons?)
Because in CLASSIC, only one of them is disabled, which is the matrix one.
My website: Currently boring.

Projects:
Axe Interpreter
   > Core: Done
   > Memory: Need write code to add constants.
   > Graphics: Rewritten.  Needs to integrate sprites with constants.
   > IO: GetKey done.  Need to add mostly homescreen IO stuff.
Croquette:
   > Stomping bugs
   > Internet version: On hold until I can make my website less boring/broken.

Online DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI-84 Plus OS
« Reply #29 on: September 12, 2010, 02:28:29 pm »
Yeah it stopped working completly I think. Celtic III worked, but some xLIB functions in Celtic III has minor compatibility issues. Doors CS solve the issue, though.