« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???  (Read 3974 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« on: November 16, 2009, 02:55:22 pm »
&fmt=18

Logged

Offline ztrumpet

  • The Rarely Active One
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 5712
  • Rating: +364/-4
  • If you see this, send me a PM. Just for fun.
    • View Profile
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2009, 03:35:15 pm »
lol! That's very nice!

How is the 81 so fast?
Logged

Offline Galandros

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1140
  • Rating: +42/-10
    • View Profile
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2009, 04:16:17 pm »
Quote from: ztrumpet on November 16, 2009, 03:35:15 pm
lol! That's very nice!

How is the 81 so fast?
And faster than a 83. Does the IS>( command do so much difference?
I would like to compare the 81 and 83 with the same code.
Logged
Hobbing in calculator projects.

Offline ztrumpet

  • The Rarely Active One
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 5712
  • Rating: +364/-4
  • If you see this, send me a PM. Just for fun.
    • View Profile
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2009, 05:10:41 pm »
Yeah, what about the exact identical code?  Also, could you compare the 81 to an 84+se?

What song is that in the background?
Logged

Offline TsukasaZX

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 415
  • Rating: +46/-3
  • Never Gonna Give You Up!
    • View Profile
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2009, 06:52:12 pm »
Quite interesting. This just goes to prove my conspiracy theory that the TI Nspire was created as a means of killing our community :O
Logged
IRC EFNet | Nick Su-Hime | Chan #omnimaga, #unss, #cemetech
Yumé - 100% Complete!
Yumé 2: Rika's Story - 10%
 - Hiatus until summertime
Yumé: The Eternal Dreams - 50%
 - World and events
TIBiC/GO C Library - N%

"Alenda lux ubi orta libertas" - Let learning be cherished where liberty has arisen.

  ▲
▲ ▲ Triforce!

Offline Builderboy

  • Physics Guru
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 5673
  • Rating: +613/-9
  • Would you kindly?
    • View Profile
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2009, 07:13:18 pm »
Wow, that sux. X.x

i heard it has some more advanced manipulations tho.
Logged

Offline Eeems

  • Mr. Dictator
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6268
  • Rating: +318/-36
  • little oof
    • View Profile
    • Eeems
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2009, 08:15:06 pm »
Wow that was an eye opener! I agree with TsukasaZX
Logged
/e

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI-Nspire BASIC slower than TI-81 (and 83+) BASIC???
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2009, 10:59:18 pm »
Quote from: Galandros on November 16, 2009, 04:16:17 pm
Quote from: ztrumpet on November 16, 2009, 03:35:15 pm
lol! That's very nice!

How is the 81 so fast?
And faster than a 83. Does the IS>( command do so much difference?
I would like to compare the 81 and 83 with the same code.
I did, before doing that video. Wrote the exact same code as on the TI-81 and it ran even slower than with For(. To me, the TI-81 probably has much faster home screen scrolling routines, by far, because on the TI-83+ if I just do For(Z,1,999:Output(1,1,Z:End, it goes faster than the TI-81 code. Also, when I ported Illusiat 81 to the other models, I had to insert some slowdowns everywhere so it runs at same speed. Basically, the TI-81 may be 3 times slower than a 83+, but the Disp command seems considerably faster than on every other calc. (btw the reason why I used different code on the 81 is due to the lack of For(/While/Repeat commands)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »