376
Miscellaneous / Re: Sorry. Yes I did apologize. I'm not being sarcastic.
« on: April 17, 2011, 02:03:03 am »
I put an edit on that post to add clarity and prevent any further problems it may have caused.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 376
Miscellaneous / Re: Sorry. Yes I did apologize. I'm not being sarcastic.« on: April 17, 2011, 02:03:03 am »
I put an edit on that post to add clarity and prevent any further problems it may have caused.
377
Miscellaneous / Re: Random YouTube Videos« on: April 17, 2011, 02:01:53 am »Looks like the guy in your avatar, but with a hat on...That would be the Heavy of Team Fortress 2, usually the game's flagship character due to his abundance of personality, which is different, but no greater than that of the 8 other characters. He's just a popular class that may be good for most first-timers. 378
Project M (Super Mario) / Re: Project M Reboot« on: April 17, 2011, 01:58:50 am »
Due to calc84 being the busy guy he is, and with the other projects he has going, the estimated release date on Project M is approximately 1 year after HL2: Ep3
379
Miscellaneous / Re: Random YouTube Videos« on: April 17, 2011, 01:34:55 am »
I can guarantee nobody will understand this one at all.
380
Miscellaneous / Re: Sorry. Yes I did apologize. I'm not being sarcastic.« on: April 17, 2011, 01:31:13 am »
I probably wasn't clear about the interpreter thing either, I just meant that I was generally unhappy that it was not a compiler. I didn't intend to say "Re-write the entire program because it's awful".
381
Introduce Yourself! / Re: No calculator yet, but I think I'll get one (intro topic)« on: April 17, 2011, 01:17:37 am »
84 also has AXE, which is
382
Miscellaneous / Sorry. Yes I did apologize. I'm not being sarcastic.« on: April 17, 2011, 01:14:05 am »
Unlike many people, I'm not going to complain over a ban, but instead admit to being responsible for it. Ban me as much as you need, just mind the fact that I have moments of innate idiocy. Sorry. I think I'm going to play it safe now and not share my opinion on anything. Continue rating this down if you wish.
-Sincerely, a split-personality disorder victim that forgot his name PS: If this is trolling or complaining, it is not intended and I take all responsibility for it. 383
News / Re: Lua on the Nspire?« on: April 13, 2011, 12:48:01 pm »
Interpreter?! CRAP! <--umad
EDIT to add clarity: I am generally not good with interpreters. I am not trying to degrade them in any way, shape or form. Thank you for your negative ratings. Seriously, I don't mind. 384
News / Re: Lua on the Nspire?« on: April 13, 2011, 11:47:42 am »
That being the reason for emulators.
385
News / Re: Lua on the Nspire?« on: April 13, 2011, 11:44:08 am »
Portable code is fun to play with...
Until you brick everything 386
News / Re: Lua on the Nspire?« on: April 13, 2011, 11:41:28 am »
Well then...
I call not first candidate for hacking in more functions! 387
Casio Calculators / Re: Prizm goals« on: April 13, 2011, 11:39:34 am »
And yet TI hates us for cracking open a way to use their 90Mhz processor?
388
News / Re: Lua on the Nspire?« on: April 13, 2011, 11:36:13 am »
I always wondered: How do people make those functions that come in the lib, the first ones with no dependencies? Probably a ton of strenuous hard-coding.
389
Casio Calculators / Re: Prizm goals« on: April 13, 2011, 11:32:57 am »
Sounds easier than ndless. Do the programs have the permission to use the entire screen? Also how fast are they, like I said.
390
TI Z80 / Re: Asylum« on: April 13, 2011, 11:31:31 am »
It's funny because you could do it in BASIC. But it would be a tad slower... And not as fast or good visuals.
EDIT: And crappy. |
|