361
TI Z80 / Re: zStart - an app that runs on ram clears
« on: July 26, 2011, 04:42:18 pm »
zStart and Omnicalc's Fast Apps won't play nice together.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 361
TI Z80 / Re: zStart - an app that runs on ram clears« on: July 26, 2011, 04:42:18 pm »
zStart and Omnicalc's Fast Apps won't play nice together.
362
TI Z80 / Re: zStart - an app that runs on ram clears« on: July 25, 2011, 11:40:20 pm »Actually, there's one thing CalcUtil does that zStart doesn't: allow log() to be used with arbitrary bases. I know MathPrint OSes have a logbase() function, but 2.53 was sooo buggy for me last I tried it.Does your calculator have the full 128 K of RAM? It's a long shot, but what if MathPrint actually requires the host calculator to only have 48 K of RAM? Some people have reported that MathPrint works fine for them. 363
TI Z80 / Re: zStart - an app that runs on ram clears« on: July 25, 2011, 02:04:24 am »
Nice. I was wondering what happened to this project. I'll try this on my calculator.
364
General Calculator Help / Re: My OS (2.43) is a heap of ruins!« on: July 25, 2011, 02:00:59 am »
It may not be a typo so much as a leftover from the days when the EOS didn't support flash memory.
365
General Calculator Help / Re: My OS (2.43) is a heap of ruins!« on: July 24, 2011, 04:17:14 pm »
No. I said that the boot-mode self test will clear everything. The Mode Alpha+S, however, only resets RAM.
366
General Calculator Help / Re: My OS (2.43) is a heap of ruins!« on: July 24, 2011, 04:15:36 pm »
It's completely different. Mode Alpha+S doesn't erase the entire archive and OS. It just resets RAM.
367
General Calculator Help / Re: My OS (2.43) is a heap of ruins!« on: July 24, 2011, 04:05:53 pm »
It sounds like something got pretty seriously corrupted. You've already erased all your programs, appvars, et cetera? Do you mind resending all your apps and OS, too? Remove a battery for several seconds, hold MODE, and reinsert the battery. This will erase pretty much everything: the OS, all applications, and everything that was and is still in the archive. This is the boot code's self test function, which tests almost every sector of the flash chip.
368
Lua / Re: Third-party ports of Lua to TI calculators...« on: July 22, 2011, 06:04:51 pm »Remember, the new 84+(SE) boot code is further proof that they're trying more actively than ever to lock things down.I honestly think that TI doesn't understand the purpose of the RSA signature. I think they think of the signature as being akin to a real signature, and that factoring the keys means we can forge their real, legally binding signature. They upgraded to 2048-bit RSA because they don't want us forging their signature, not because they don't want us making 3rd-party OSes or patching the OS. Either that, or they actually don't understand that we had the ability to unlock flash years before we factored their keys, or the importance thereof. 369
Other Calculators / Re: Everyone Should Use Calcsys« on: July 22, 2011, 01:30:35 am »Yeah. I got it cleared up with BrandonW. He says that he's not sure it'll work on all calcs, though.MicrOS, by default, runs with flash unlocked. It also has a port monitor, so it's perfect for testing writes to protected ports. And the hex editor is way better than Calcsys's, in part because it was designed from the start to support flash editing. Calcsys should work fine on the Nspire. As far as I know, it really doesn't do anything strange; in fact, it tries to avoid modifying state unless you ask it to. 370
Math and Science / Re: The Beauty of Mathematics« on: July 21, 2011, 10:03:26 pm »
Nope. I put it there because QuickBASIC uses pass-by-reference by default.
371
Math and Science / Re: The Beauty of Mathematics« on: July 21, 2011, 07:23:21 pm »
Make a plot of the length of all Roman numerals less than some value and you get a bell curve.
EDIT: Code for the lazy: Code: [Select] FUNCTION decToRom$ (num AS INTEGER)
372
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: You can help us solve a few mysteries!« on: July 19, 2011, 02:42:02 pm »
thepenguin77, your information is a little out-of-date. I did some more research on the flash chips:
Code: [Select] Known manufacturer IDs are Notice how the TI-83+'s chip was originally a 5.0 V chip, but is now a 3.0 V chip? TI moved to 3.0 V logic. This means that the calculator will safely operate down to voltages of 3.0 V. (In fact, the flash chip data sheet says the maximum voltage you can safely supply to the flash chip is 3.6 V.) If you supply more than 3.0 V, the voltage regulator just converts the extra voltage into heat. TI really ought to update the TI-83+ OS not to signal low battery until 3.5 V, and redesign the case to accept only 3 AAAs---think of all the millions of batteries being wasted! The same goes for the TI-83+SE. It also seems that the serial port now operates at 3 V instead of 5 V. The TI-84+/SE will also operate at 3.0 V (confirmed with an assembly program running with interrupts disabled), but the USB port might not work right.
373
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Speed« on: July 19, 2011, 12:59:08 am »Er, no. The EOS kindly automatically reduces the CPU speed to 6 MHz before running assembly programs and applications so that any timing code runs the same. You're expected to explicitly set the CPU speed if you want to run at full speed. However, BASIC programs automatically run in fast mode.I'm writing my first major Axe program and I noticed that the speed isn't much faster than BASIC. Is this because my TI-84+ is too old?No it must be the way you are formatting your code. A 84+ runs at ~15MHz no matter how old it is. 374
Miscellaneous / Re: IRC over Telnet« on: July 16, 2011, 12:59:37 am »
Have you tried a different server?
375
Introduce Yourself! / Re: Hiya everyone!« on: July 15, 2011, 09:59:44 pm »
Reimplementing the parser is not for the faint of heart. The parser pretty much exposes the entire functionality of the EOS.
|
|