This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Freyaday
Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 173
826
« on: September 30, 2011, 10:09:41 am »
Theoretically, it could be abused, but it wouldn't be any more optimized than a regular if statement, just more cluttered and less readable. I added the ? and ?? as operators specifically to avoid chains of if/while statements like If A:If B:If C:something:End:End:End should just be if A?B?C:something:End. I don't want to allow intentionally misleading code as legal syntax when there is already a better way to represent it.
Huh. Actually, Builder, that is not what it would do. Q?If Blarg stuff Q?End Would execute stuff if Q=0, or, failing that, if Blarg!=0 Key term here is "failing that". If Q=0, Blarg could be infinity (-1, anyone?) or it could be 0, and it wouldn't matter.
827
« on: September 30, 2011, 10:04:09 am »
2235:   you tried to use AXE to split wood, and ended up with a damaged calc which you replaced immediately.
2237: You succeeded.
828
« on: September 30, 2011, 10:03:03 am »
Heavier abuse of the ? operators.
I would like to be able to use the ? operators with ANYTHING.
For example Q?Goto Q
Or
Q?If FOO
Stuff
Q?End
(Where FOO is a really, really complicated piece of logic)
Or, horror of horrors,
Q?For(w/e)
Loopy stuff
Q?End
829
« on: September 30, 2011, 12:52:57 am »
Why can't we abuse the ? operators?
I want to be able to do
Q?If blarg
Stuff
Q?End
What exactly would that do? O_o
It would ignore the If statement if Q!=0, executing Stuff
830
« on: September 30, 2011, 12:11:52 am »
.FIZZBUZZ
For(Q,1,100)
!If Q^3
Disp "FIZZ"
End
!If Q^5
Disp "BUZZ"
End
If Q^3?Q^5
Disp Q
End
Disp i
End
831
« on: September 30, 2011, 12:07:27 am »
2234: Your VAT is so large you can't think of anything adequately humongous to compare it to.
832
« on: September 30, 2011, 12:05:56 am »
Why can't we abuse the ? operators?
I want to be able to do
Q?If blarg
Stuff
Q?End
833
« on: September 29, 2011, 12:59:18 pm »
Plains of Existence
834
« on: September 28, 2011, 11:13:05 pm »
Good idea.
I was thinking about it for a while and I think I shall add it. I will, however, have to rewrite my map code anyways, so adding it won't be much of an issue. Although map size will increase. Also not sure on the displaying of it.
uh, uh.....Fourscale?
835
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:59:09 pm »
2220: When you call your calc "baby", other people just act as if it's normal
2221: It is
2222: For you, at least
836
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:42:13 pm »
2216: You don't need to test it; you know it's perfect.
2217: You do anyway. Best practices and all that.
837
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:38:10 pm »
2212: You can type on your calculator in the dark. 2214: A full program, in the dark, with one hand.
2215: You can test it in the dark, too
838
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:28:46 pm »
Can there be multiple levels of ground?
839
« on: September 28, 2011, 09:43:55 pm »
2213: You don't need to type on your calculator
840
« on: September 28, 2011, 04:35:52 pm »
I made a clone of butt's program with massively failing water initialization.
Next up: Learning water physics so I can add actual physics in there! Whee!
Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 173
|
Show Posts