1096: Stare at the center of this picture for 30 seconds. Now look on the nearby wall. You should see a lobster.

1104. You forced yourself to see a lobster.

(Also, ctrl + backspace clears the previous word. Not exactly like clear but close)

You know, if you were to do this in real time, couldn't you have two functions that run? One that adds 1 to an array of three elements, and another that compares each value to a char's stat. If the element is high enough, the char is ready.

1085. You have all the xkcd's on your calc.

1086. You've wrote in straight hex on the calc.

Ha, I laugh at that

We get off of school for 1'' - 2''.

Today we had our first snow. It actually got heavy for about 20 - 30 minutes. Unfortunately none of it stuck. :'(

It really will suck if we end up not having a lot of snow this year because I'm a senior and I don't have to worry about extra school days at the end of the year.

I love snow. I was born in Buffalo and lived there for a while. So my early childhood had a lot of snow. I move down to Maryland, they get so little snow, they closed school due to the threat of snow. (It was pretty funny when it didn't snow the next day though)

Quote
can you even begin to argue for impossibility when this is such an overwhelming huge universe?

Yes, P∨¬P. QED.

I googled this and didn't find anything

Could you supply a link.

What I said is not to say that it is impossible to have impossibilities () But that if you have nothing that disproves the theory or goes against what is to be 100% Then the probability is as stated. However if only one instance of that disproof manifests itself. In that particular case,, yes it is impossible to be 100%. Because you have something that prevents it from being 100%.

(I hope this makes some sort of sense. I'm not a good explainer of things)

It depends upon the scope of the data collected whether or not 100% is possible or not.

In a finite set of data and subjects. It very well is completely possible to have 100% success (or failure) rates of what is being tested.

Only if the set of subjects and data is infinite, then the probability of 100% would be 1/(infinity). In other words, next to impossible.

Other than that, there is always a chance (though sometimes very small) at being 100%

In the terms of the original topic of NLP, if it can work at some level on everyone, then it is 100%. The chances of it actually being 100% though, are very small. Like 1/6000000000 That is because if there is only one person in the world that it does not affect period, then it's not 100%. However, until we find such a person there is a very, very small chance (but a chance nonetheless) of it being 100%.

(Sorry for my weird way of writing, I'm in "Think Mode" atm )

Ok. Lets see. We'll need one for normal battles, one for normal bosses, and two for major bosses. One will be against a certain "legendary" daemon (aptly called "The Daemon" ) And another against the boss of the corporation.(Who will be the final boss)

Other than that we'll need a theme for the main character. I'm thinking two versions of it, one sort of light-hearted perhaps with flutes, and another darker, more intense.