Well I don't guarantee that I'll be bored enough time to cartoonify them all
Because I am not using a "cartoonify software", I base myself on the model he gives but I still have to do it by hand.

edit Which size is this one supposed to be ? Because I suppose that 100x100 is a bit high...

I like cartoonized versions better too because they don't have lighting fails when rotating (since they don't really have lighting) but I agree that it is a lot more annoying to get them ready.

Thanks all

Dat grayscale when moving, though

That's just Wabbitemu, I recorded with weird settings with a low number of shades. But on calc you don't see anything weird like that

Quote from: Hayleia on June 19, 2014, 04:12:05 pm

...I can't understand anything in JWinslow's code o.o

Rude!

Lol, I didn't mean "he codes like his foot" but just "I can never understand people's code since I don't know which RAM area is used for what"
I even have to comment my code to understand what I did sometimes

And that inconsistency with speed you're talking about? It's actually intentional, but not in the way anyone has percieved it.
How my code works is: tiles move a certain speed towards their targets depending on their distance (a la the original). Therefore, it makes sense that the less tiles on the screen, the faster it seems; that means tiles may move a greater distance, and with a greater "speed". And this also stands with the more tiles on the screen, the less of a distance the tiles move, the slower it seems to go.

Well I did that too but for some reason I had the impression that I had to wait longer when more tiles moved, not just that they moved slower.

You did very good with yours! (Although it could be a bit faster... )

Thanks, and yeah, I think I'll make them move twice as fast. When tiles have to move great distance it might be visible that they skip pixels but on small distances they still won't skip any pixel and they'll still be faster.

Just something about my code, there's some Action Replay during the animation, as in "you can't see shit when tiles are moving so I am not drawing properly and you can't tell the difference"

(todo too, it's like homing lasers - shut up Hayleia that's actually in the original)

I didn't say anything
Plus, I tried the original (on GameCube) and I saw them.
And don't ask me why I tried the last level on the hardest difficulty. I didn't understand anything in that checkerboard at the end

I'll answer the last question first, because my answer is easy: I don't know

Now, the first question is kind of easy to answer now that KhiCas is out. You just need to Ndless your OS and you have a CAS, no matter what your hardware revision is and no matter what your OS is (as long as it runs Ndless so 3.6 or 3.1).
Otherwise, if you want a real CAS OS on your calc, then you'll have to use nlaunch. The problem is that you can't have a CAS OS 3.6 with nlaunch. You can have a non CAS 3.6 OS, and every 3.1 and 3.2 OSes (CAS or not). You can even have two OSes on your calc if you want so you can have 3.6 non CAS and 3.1 CAS.

So what do you want ?

Best music ever. Best game ever in fact, they should do a remake of it on the 3DS. Or on any platform, I'll buy it if this comes out.


UT 2004 also has some interesting music.

Thanks. But I assumed that since matref uses n2DL (would have been the same with nSDL), he needs to put an ugly color as a background to set it as the transparency color, so either I put myself an ugly color (you would have complained even more ) or I put something else as a background, whether real transparency or white, it doesn't matter anyway because matref will have to open an image editor to put his ugly color. Plus, I don't know which ugly color he used for the sprites he already has and I thought he might want to use the same so I let the background white.