This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Hot_Dog
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 194
1096
« on: March 11, 2011, 03:58:40 am »
Part of the reason that Correlation is not available yet for beta testing is I am making sure that few bugs exist when testing begins. To that point, I am always creating new test programs to play with. So here's another screenshot demonstrating animated tiles.
Source:
------------------
int("TESTFOUR
det({4,2,1,1,3}) ;We have one animation with 4 frames, one with 2, two
;non-animated images, and one animation with 3 frames
int("AY
int("M0
int("E0
Lbl AA
e^(0,0,Str0
int("DD
For(N,1,300
End
Goto AA
1097
« on: March 11, 2011, 03:27:02 am »
Yeah I am curious about that. Maybe the devourer focus will be more on large units than the corruptor and the corruptor will be changed a bit?
Anyways, I certainly think they'll make a comeback in single player mode. And I'm Mickey Mouse if I don't use them
1098
« on: March 11, 2011, 03:18:26 am »
Does corruptors slows down enemy attacks? Also if I remember, devourers were very slow at attacking.
Devourers are slow at attacking, but the acid spores allowed mutalisks to attack with up to 18, 12 and 10 damage on their glave worms, as well as giving hydralisks up to 19 damage. Corruptors themselves increase damage output by corruption. So it seems like devourers and corruptors would share roles, except corruptors can take out capital ships themselves. Devourers are more of a support unit. Still, thanks to corruptors, I have not needed devourers
1099
« on: March 11, 2011, 03:12:37 am »
Okay, so why use corruptors if devourers come into play
1100
« on: March 11, 2011, 12:11:15 am »
That's actually not bad. However, copying 8000 bytes of code takes about 1/35 of a second, so there would be lags from time to time
Incidentally, I did not know that the SDK used to cost money, even though I knew that some applications did cost money
1101
« on: March 09, 2011, 04:06:51 am »
Ah ok. Personally there was the rude side that didn't, but the other side where it's obviously annoying to get asked the same thing over and over despite the fact you wanted the tutorial that way. It was kinda like in 2004-05 when people kept bugging me non-stop asking "Why don't you learn ASM" and later "Why don't you use BasicBuilder?". In the ASM case it almost became harrassment.
Good point. Whatever the case, I really do appreciate it when you give me +1 whevenever you think about it 
1102
« on: March 09, 2011, 04:04:08 am »
I'm happy to see archived fonts are now possible. Is the speed difference noticeable or is it negligible like xLIB? (1-ish% slowdown)
I'm pretty sure you won't tell the difference in speed.
1103
« on: March 09, 2011, 04:02:01 am »
Well to be honest I negated one of the vote, since I felt it was kinda rude, especially if someone never asked before and is new, but I don't feel it deserves under +1 so if it was 0 I would probably have uprated it.
Actually, I didnt' feel that it even deserved +1
1104
« on: March 08, 2011, 11:51:30 pm »
Nope, it's not. Keep em coming!
1105
« on: March 08, 2011, 10:37:20 pm »
Yeah, you're right, and that one's weird because I usually test my programs
1106
« on: March 08, 2011, 03:07:10 pm »
Also, the page numbers are kinda off. It should say page 37 in the TOC, but it only says 36.
Thanks for pointing that out, because I did ask people to find typos like that 
1107
« on: March 08, 2011, 05:37:00 am »
Hey, Nemo, do you have the source code for the GUI version of the font compiler? I have a couple of changes I need to make
1109
« on: March 07, 2011, 01:54:46 am »
I'm at least glad to see all these projects on the list, for the fact it means they're not dead. DJ, I couldn't have said it better myself
1110
« on: March 07, 2011, 12:52:46 am »
You can now access archived fonts. In this screenshot, pgrmTESTTWOT is the font that the example program uses. You can, of course, see that it is archived
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 194
|
Show Posts