This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Hot_Dog
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 194
781
« on: May 12, 2011, 10:55:45 pm »
What happens if I attempt to use a shell-required axiom in a program that is not compiled for shell use?
782
« on: May 12, 2011, 07:07:08 pm »
Another reason for Axe to enforce parentheses:
[16:47:34] <+Hot_Dog> wow, it's still not working
[16:47:51] <+Hot_Dog> even on hardware
[16:48:40] <+Hot_Dog> I just don't know
[16:48:55] <+Runer112> what does the source code look like
[16:48:59] <+Runer112> for your test program
[16:49:19] <+Hot_Dog> .ABC : AsmComp(AXIOM : 9
[16:49:30] <+Runer112> umm
[16:49:35] <+Runer112> add an ending parenthesis maybe?
[16:49:51] <+Hot_Dog> indeed, forgot that
[16:49:56] <+Hot_Dog> that was the problem all alone
[16:49:59] <+Hot_Dog> *along
[16:50:01] <+Runer112> wait
[16:50:03] <+Runer112> did that fix it?
[16:50:07] <+Hot_Dog> yes it did
[16:50:08] <+Runer112> lol
[16:50:20] * +Hot_Dog bangs head against wall again
[16:50:21] <@DThought> And that is why I think Quigibo should enforce it 
[16:50:26] <+Runer112> and this is why Axe sorely needs to force parenthesis closing
[16:50:36] <+Runer112> so many bugs caused by open parentheses
[16:50:38] <@DThought> Ninja'd, Runer.
It just adds another thing to remember when debugging sometimes
Yeah, I spent 2 days trying to find a bug that turned out to be just one missing parenthesis at the end
783
« on: May 11, 2011, 04:57:08 pm »
It doesn't matter...if you follow the instructions carefully, the "ret" automatically added at the end is actually a help rather than a hinderance.
784
« on: May 11, 2011, 11:03:41 am »
Wait, wasn't this released a while ago?
It was, but people kept on reading the older lessons because I forgot to provide a download link. I wanted to keep the old lessons up, so I made a new topic
785
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:55:48 pm »
Cool. Do you think it will come out before May 15th? It would make the contest even more interesting  (since any Axiom released before May 15th 1 AM GMT-5 can be used in it)
Interesting, interesting...SURE! Unless something goes wrong, it will be ready. Come the 15th, you should let people know that it's available, since I'm sure some people will prefer programs over apps
786
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:46:35 pm »
This is awesome Hot Dog! I think you need to upload this on ticalc.org asap. The 8KB limit is something that hindered ASM coders for a decade. I'M glad you got it to work on the 83+. Hopefully it can be used in Axe too.
The original crabcake has been uploaded. I plan to upload the Axe portion as soon as it is complete.
787
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:19:31 pm »
788
« on: May 10, 2011, 10:15:22 pm »
Hold on, crabcake is for Axe? That's right!
789
« on: May 10, 2011, 09:19:58 pm »
By popular request, I am now writing Axe Axioms for Crabcake. Just remember that your Axe game will need to be shell-compatible. Also, the Axioms will use polar variables for execution. For example:
;To start Crabcake
r1
r2
r1r
;Axe game
Sounds cool, but would that conflict with using r1-r6 as variables, or can the parser handle that? Because r1-r6 are used to feed subroutines arguments when they are called, which makes them very commonly used variables.
It would indeed conflict, so I switched to AxesOn and AxesOff
790
« on: May 10, 2011, 05:39:21 pm »
By popular request, I am now writing Axe Axioms for Crabcake. Just remember that your Axe game will need to be shell-compatible. Also, the Axioms will use polar variables for execution. For example:
;To start Crabcake
r1
r2
r1r
;Axe game
791
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:53:30 am »
Will Axe create ASM programs even if the programs turn out to exceed 8 KBs?
792
« on: May 09, 2011, 08:56:56 pm »
I have tested this on Ti-83+ BE Boot 1.01, so everything is ship-shape. I have attached a bug-fixed readme, and I'm ready to post this on ticalc.org
793
« on: May 09, 2011, 03:42:46 pm »
Does anyone know the point of the 8kb limit?
TI didn't want people pirating applications. This was in the days when people were supposed to "sell" them
794
« on: May 09, 2011, 03:39:05 pm »
Will this work with Axe? Because I know the guy who is making Eitrix could use something like this. So make an axiom? Not sure if it'd work.
It could work, but I have no knowledge of making axioms. If someone else wanted to make an axiom, they would have my full permission just out of curiosity, can you explain how it works on a BE?
The BE has a special port that makes it possible to run large programs. This port is protected, but I found a "weakness/exploit" in the operating system to make it possible. BrandonW's flash unlocker was needed, and so he has my thanks
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 194
|
Show Posts
